RE: LogFactoryImpl.java - SecurityException

2002-03-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Tim Vernum wrote: The contact the logging has, is that it will attempt the following: * Look a attribute set on Factory * Look at system properties * Try log4j * Try JDK1.4 * Use Default (no-op?) log This is definitely the desired contract. Unfortunately, the

RE: LogFactoryImpl.java - SecurityException

2002-03-26 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Would it be possible for someone to change file LogFactoryImpl.java? It currently has: } catch (SecurityException e) { } And it might be better if it had: } catch (SecurityException e) { logClassName

Re: LogFactoryImpl.java - SecurityException

2002-03-25 Thread Juozas Baliuka
Hi, I does not work on this project, but I think it is not the best idea to set default logger on security exeption. It will be very dificult to find a problem and grant requred permissions or to dissable logging if app does not have permissions for logging. The most *secure* way not to catch