Re: New componenent: i18n

2004-10-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
Brett Porter wrote: > What do you think is missing, i18n or xmlio? Brain? Gosh, noticed myself some minutes ago ... - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: New componenent: i18n

2004-10-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
OK, problem between th ears ... Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons-sandbox/xmlio/ XMLIO > RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-commons-sandbox/i18n/project.xml,v I18N Back to the missing style sheet: The commons-site.jsl reference tigris.css and mave

Re: New componenent: i18n

2004-10-11 Thread Brett Porter
Because the link is to xmlio, but the CVS log you are doing is on i18n. It works for me with pserver, and this: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons-sandbox/i18n/project.xml exists. If you are seeing project.xml in the xmlio tree, your CVS directories may be screwed and have Reposi

RE: New componenent: i18n

2004-10-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
Jörg Schaible wrote: > Brett Porter wrote on Monday, October 11, 2004 2:34 PM: > >> Works for me: >> >> $ cvs log project.xml >> >> RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/i18n/project.xml,v >> Working file: project.xml head: 1.8 >> branch: >> locks: strict >> access list: >> symbolic names

Re: New componenent: i18n

2004-10-11 Thread Brett Porter
That's a different project to what we are talking about, I thought. i18n shows them up on CVSweb. Is it possible xmlio never had a Maven descriptor? http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons-sandbox/xmlio/ ... OK, I used for some reason /home/cvspublic/... as CVSROOT in the office and obv

RE: New componenent: i18n

2004-10-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
Brett Porter wrote on Monday, October 11, 2004 2:34 PM: > Works for me: > > $ cvs log project.xml > > RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/i18n/project.xml,v > Working file: project.xml head: 1.8 > branch: > locks: strict > access list: > symbolic names: > keyword substitution: kv > total

Re: New componenent: i18n

2004-10-08 Thread Tim Reilly
Daniel, Catching up on my emails for a moment...I noticed no one has replied here, unless I missed it? Curious about your question I checked out i18n ... hmm..seems: pomArtifactId comes from the name element and not the id element. I recognize the error as possible missing element. In this case s