robert burrell donkin wrote:
>On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 12:44 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>
>
>>P.S. Oliver isn't on the Jakarta "whoweare" page, although he was voted on
>>to the PMC in January.
>>
>>
>
>sounds like it's time for oliver to add himself...
>
>- robert
>
>
>
Done. Thanks for
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 12:44 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> P.S. Oliver isn't on the Jakarta "whoweare" page, although he was voted on
> to the PMC in January.
sounds like it's time for oliver to add himself...
- robert
-
To u
Its now been 72+ hours since this vote was called and the vote has passed,
with the following people all voting +1 (and no other votes):
Robert Burrell Donkin (binding)
Niall Pemberton (binding)
Dion Gillard (binding)
Rahul Akolkar (binding)
Oliver Heger (binding)
Phil Steitz (binding)
Stephen Col
Niall Pemberton wrote:
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
Not sure whether you intended to include validator_2_0_0_proposal.dtd in
the release?
Stephen
--
+1
Phil
On 3/20/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
>
> Thanks for all the feedback on RC2, differences from that RC are:
>
> - corrected problems with "localized" tests
> - corrected a problem generating the
Sorry for the dely, was quite busy the last days. RC3 looks good to me,
there are no more problems with the tests. So here is my +1!
Oliver
Niall Pemberton wrote:
>So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
>it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Ste
On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
>
>
> [X] +1 I support this release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
>
>
-Rahul
> Niall
>
On 3/23/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
> > it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
> > Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
> >
>
>
> B
On 3/23/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
> it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
> Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
>
Best if that issue doesn't arise, IMO.
> If there are any other vot
+1. Looks ok to me.
On 3/24/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
> it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
> Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
>
> If there are any other votes out there they wo
So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
If there are any other votes out there they would be v.welcome :-)
Niall
On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
+1 from me btw :-)
On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ ] +1 I support this release
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
>
>
> Niall
-
To unsubscr
Thanks for the feedback (and vote) Robert, comments inline...
On 3/21/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 05:37 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
> >
> > Thanks for all the feedback
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 05:37 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
>
> Thanks for all the feedback on RC2, differences from that RC are:
>
> - corrected problems with "localized" tests
> - corrected a problem generating the md5
14 matches
Mail list logo
