Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-03-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 2/18/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm interested in knowing where things are with each of the non-dormant sandboxes. ie) Convince me why I shouldn't be proposing that a component be moved to dormant. snip/ I more or less agree with things Tim says here [1]. On related notes:

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-20 Thread Henri Yandell
Summarizing this thread: compress. Doesn't sound like there are any strong itches to do any work here. Consider for dormancy. csv. Minor activity, continue in the sandbox. exec. Niklas hopes to work on this sometime soon. I suggest we reevaluate in 3 months. finger. Dormancy. i18n. Dormancy.

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-20 Thread Brett Porter
On 21/02/2007, at 1:25 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: Summarizing this thread: compress. Doesn't sound like there are any strong itches to do any work here. Consider for dormancy. I still have an itch, but it's behind exec and openpgp (and because there were others willing to work on it).

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-20 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi Henri! Summarizing this thread: compress. Doesn't sound like there are any strong itches to do any work here. Consider for dormancy. I still have an itch, but it's behind exec and openpgp (and because there were others willing to work on it). Yes, please give it an additional iteration.

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-19 Thread Torsten Curdt
compress - Despite our attempt to get this released, nothing seems to have happened here. Anyone? IMO the API still needs work. I was trying to implement another archiver and just gave up on it. With TrueZip working (but being far from perfect either) it is just very hard to justify the

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-19 Thread Henri Yandell
On 2/19/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: compress - Despite our attempt to get this released, nothing seems to have happened here. Anyone? IMO the API still needs work. I was trying to implement another archiver and just gave up on it. With TrueZip working (but being far from

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-19 Thread C . Grobmeier
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 01:08:19 -0800, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/19/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: compress - Despite our attempt to get this released, nothing seems to have happened here. Anyone? IMO the API still needs work. I was trying to implement another

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-19 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
Henri Yandell wrote: exec - Niklas did some work last July, but nothing's happened since. Anyone know if the future holds anything for exec? I hope to be able to spend some more time on exec pretty soon. Mostly to move to the new M2 build and then maybe get a 1.0-RC1 out (is that appropriate

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-19 Thread Brett Porter
On 19/02/2007, at 3:57 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: openpgp - Antoine committed a couple of fixes last October, but otherwise nothing. If this component is not released, I presume Maven is not using it. If Maven is not using it, I suspect no one is. Is it dormant? The others have been

RE: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-19 Thread Jörg Schaible
Henri Yandell wrote on Monday, February 19, 2007 5:58 AM: I'm interested in knowing where things are with each of the non-dormant sandboxes. ie) Convince me why I shouldn't be proposing that a component be moved to dormant. -- [snip] id - Jörg seems to be working on this. Any plans

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-19 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, I would be interested to release the little which is already in openpgp. It does not yet provide functionality for maven users, but it provides one useful ant task to pgp sign artefacts. Regards, Antoine On Feb 19, 2007, at 6:09 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 19/02/2007, at 3:57 PM,

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-19 Thread James Carman
Henri, I think proxy is ready for a 1.0 release, but I don't think we ever got everyone to +1 its release. James On 2/18/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm interested in knowing where things are with each of the non-dormant sandboxes. ie) Convince me why I shouldn't be proposing

RE: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-19 Thread Michael Heuer
J?rg Schaible wrote: Henri Yandell wrote on Monday, February 19, 2007 5:58 AM: I'm interested in knowing where things are with each of the non-dormant sandboxes. ie) Convince me why I shouldn't be proposing that a component be moved to dormant. -- [snip] id - J?rg seems to be

Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-18 Thread Henri Yandell
I'm interested in knowing where things are with each of the non-dormant sandboxes. ie) Convince me why I shouldn't be proposing that a component be moved to dormant. -- compress - Despite our attempt to get this released, nothing seems to have happened here. Anyone? csv - Yonik's been

Re: Status of the Sandbox?

2007-02-18 Thread Don Brown
On 2/18/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: js2j - No activity since last Sept - Don? Yeah, this something I play with when I'm using Rhino in an application, but since that hasn't been the case for a while, it has gone dormant. I'm not so sure commons is the best place anyways, so I

[cache] Cache status (was Re: sandbox 'article')

2003-11-04 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: I have not reviewed or (obviously) committed them, although I've made no other changes to cache either, so your diffs should be as good as they ever were. Unfortunately I don't really have time to commit to sheparding patches to the cache stuff in