Re: Need help with backwards incompatible resolver change

2002-11-15 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 / Craeg K Strong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | Yikes! I checked out the new xml-commons resolver code and it looks like | two things tripped me up: Sigh. I did try to keep things backwards compatible, but I guess I failed just a bit. | | (

Re: Need help with backwards incompatible resolver change

2002-11-15 Thread Craeg K Strong
Yikes! I checked out the new xml-commons resolver code and it looks like two things tripped me up: (1) Change in debug messages old way: Debug.message(1, "a debug message"); new way: catalogManager.debug.message(1,"a debug message") (2) CatalogManager no longer available as a static instance o

Re: Repository layout

2002-11-15 Thread Shane Curcuru/CAM/Lotus
Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Right now it seems that the Resolver library is the only thing in > XML-Commons CVS. But, what will happen when other code gets added to > XML-Commons? Will all of the code get mixed together? In particular, > will it be easy to check out _just_ the co

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread Shane Curcuru/CAM/Lotus
David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I envisaged a "common" home page and some top-level docs, > then separate sections for each thing that is distributed. Yup, we'll definitely need some overviews about the project as a whole, and then separate sections for each distributable component

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
David Crossley wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: David Crossley wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: David Crossley wrote: Sorry about the "xml-commons" logo. I snitched a colour from the edge of the Apache feather and knocked up a quick-and-dirty PNG. I'll make something out of SVG and post it some

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread David Crossley
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > >>David Crossley wrote: > > > > > > > >>>Sorry about the "xml-commons" logo. I snitched a colour > >>>from the edge of the Apache feather and knocked up a > >>>quick-and-dirty PNG. > >> > >>I'll make something

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
David Crossley wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: David Crossley wrote: Sorry about the "xml-commons" logo. I snitched a colour from the edge of the Apache feather and knocked up a quick-and-dirty PNG. I'll make something out of SVG and post it somewhere, then we'll see what other guys think. Great.

Need help with backwards incompatible resolver change

2002-11-15 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, Craeg Strong's patch that added resolver support to Ant worked for almost a week, but now it doesn't anymore 8-( Ant builds happily against the 1.0 release of resolver.jar, but with the current CVS code, this here happens: What is

Repository layout

2002-11-15 Thread Brian Smith
Hi, Right now it seems that the Resolver library is the only thing in XML-Commons CVS. But, what will happen when other code gets added to XML-Commons? Will all of the code get mixed together? In particular, will it be easy to check out _just_ the code and documentation for a particular part of

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread David Crossley
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Sorry about the "xml-commons" logo. I snitched a colour > > from the edge of the Apache feather and knocked up a > > quick-and-dirty PNG. > > I'll make something out of SVG and post it somewhere, then > we'll see what other guys think. Great.

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread David Crossley
Shane Curcuru/CAM/Lotus wrote: > Wow, I was just about to redo xml-commons to be forrestized > - although I had planned to completely restructure it, since > the README.html that I created long ago kinds of sucks > (I don't feel bad about writing that since I wrote it in the > first place...). Wel

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread Shane Curcuru/CAM/Lotus
Wow, I was just about to redo xml-commons to be forrestized - although I had planned to completely restructure it, since the README.html that I created long ago kinds of sucks (I don't feel bad about writing that since I wrote it in the first place...). Basically, I need to write up my proposal

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
David Crossley wrote: Apache Forrest is almost due to make its first release. So i thought it was about time to start generating the xml-commons website using Forrest. See the draft at: http://cvs.apache.org/~crossley/commons/ Cool, man! :-) Do not worry about the trail at the top. It looks strang