Shane Curcuru/CAM/Lotus wrote: > ---- David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---- > > I envisaged a "common" home page and some top-level docs, > > then separate sections for each thing that is distributed. > > Yup, we'll definitely need some overviews about the project as a whole, > and then separate sections for each distributable component. Note you get > bonus points if each component (i.e. java/resolver.xml) can have it's own > set of subdocs that can get included in it's distribution. (i.e. when > Resolver ships, it should have all the resolver docs, plus perhaps a bonus > page that describes the project it came from). As some point we'll have > to update some of the existing 'what is resolver' docs into the new > structure too.
It seems that each component may need its own "forrest" build, separate to the top-level "forrest". I see another requirement. Some documents will be as "docbook" DTD while others will be as "document-v11" DTD. Forrest should be able to handle this mixture. > > So will i go ahead and check-in to xml-commons CVS just the > > xdocs part of things that i have now? Then Shane can modify > > it directly. > > Sure, we can argue about whether to put it in xml-commons/. or in > xml-commons/java/. later. Okay, i have done an initial commit of the top-level xdocs and the Forrest config files. The demo website is also updated at http://cvs.apache.org/~crossley/commons/ --David
