David Crossley wrote, On 08/02/2003 6.30:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Attached is the xml-commons logo after the latest suggestions of some
time back. would it be ok?
In the previous discussion, we said that we did not
like the idea of an empty element.
>
You had another example where the
elemen
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Attached is the xml-commons logo after the latest suggestions of some
> time back. would it be ok?
In the previous discussion, we said that we did not
like the idea of an empty element.
You had another example where the
element was a container for the pipe - i rea
+1
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:43 AM
Subject: Nomination of Shane Curcuru as xml-commons PMC rep
>
>
>
>
> +1 to Shane being the xml-commons PMC rep, I think he will do a great job,
> both in terms of xml
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Attached is the xml-commons logo after the latest suggestions of some
> time back. would it be ok?
+1 (non-committer)
I like it!
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Linux Migration Project: http://www.linux-migration.org/
Red H
