Neil Graham wrote:
- At what stage during the processing of a document should XInclude
processing occur? Should it occur before DTD validation, namespace
processing, or after schema validation (if a document is schema-validated).
The REC itself is deliberately neutral.
IMO it's called for a more m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Is this coming from existing work in the cocoon community;
No. It was my eclipse training project.
also are the
cocoon folks behind this idea?
Not really, although I figured they'd rather have an Apache XInclude
processor rather than ERH's. The original idea was to mak
Hi Joerg,
This is very interesting. A few of us in the Xerces-J community have been
tossing the idea of adding an XInclude implementation to the parser--seems
something of a natural fit since inclusion is, in some sense at least, done
at the physical level where we operate.
So this raises a few
Wow! New work and we haven't even been advertising lately!
It certainly sounds interesting to start with; I'd like to get a sense of
what other commons-dev watchers think before we add whole new modules.
Is this coming from existing work in the cocoon community; also are the
cocoon folks behin
Hi all,
sorry for crossposting.
I'm about to commit a nucleus for an XInclude processor to XML commons.
Any opinions for/against it?
Any rules to observe? Votes to take?
The processor is currently a SAX filter with some configuration
possiblities, namely the possiblity to resolve hrefs similar to
T
