Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

2004-10-15 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Sarah McNamara dijo: > I agree we need a mechanism to identify different versions of an > xml-apis.jar, but would prefer to see a versioning scheme worked out such > that we can incorporate a Version class in the jar, version information in > the jar's manifest, and a release distribution package (

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache (xml-apis version)

2004-10-15 Thread shane_curcuru
-0 to including version number in the xml-apis.jar filename, unless someone can show it will actually make sense to most people. Hmmm. But what about including a versioned name, only for use by other projects that already include their whole mess of dependent jars in their default installs?

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

2004-10-15 Thread Sarah McNamara
David Crossley wrote: >One thing that we must have this time around, is a >version number on the xml-apis.jar filename. [1] >I suppose that is an Xml-commons "build" issue. >By the way, that build system is seriously in need >of improvement, but it gets us by. A version number 'on' the jar fil

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

2004-10-15 Thread David Crossley
I dropped most of the Cc because this part is now an issue for XML-Commons and the XML PMC. Neeraj Bajaj wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > One thing that we must have this time around, is a > > version number on the xml-apis.jar filename. [1] > > I suppose that is an Xml-commons "build" issue. >