Neil Graham wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > > I was not intending that the two get tangled. > > Either do the move before or after. > > > > Just that when "legal delays" were mentioned, > > i thought that there would be plenty of time. > > Can we be optimistic and hope not? :)
Okay then, just this once :-) > > Afterwards is fine by me. I was responding to the > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] request to consider moving soon. > > Guess this was only sent to folks subscribed to infrastructure@; I haven't > seen it on any list I'm subscribed to anyway. ... Not only infrastructure, here too. There were a couple of mentions earlier in the initial thread. Here is one: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-commons-dev&m=109775743126537 I agree with your sentiment though - infra@ should announce more widely the general desire to move to SVN. > ... Good to know that they > consider this set-up stable now; but if they really want to encourage > projects to migrate, perhaps it might not be a bad idea to (a) let them > know directly and (b) sell them on how worthwhile the pain will be. I'm > sure the pain's worthwhile from my perspective; I'd just rather wait until > we're sure we're in a period of calm than embark on something now only to > discover next week that things will get complicated. We definitely do not want to risk holding up the JAXP update. --David > > Apache Forrest was one of the early ones to move. > > The transition was a breeze and we love it now. > > Cool! > > Cheers! > Neil > Neil Graham > Manager, XML Parser Development > IBM Toronto Lab > Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519 > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
