David Crossley wrote:
Norman Walsh wrote:
Is there a process for rewrites? Suppose I spent some time working on
it, what would I do with the result? Just check the refactored code in
on top of the existing code? Put the new design in a branch? Put the
old design in a branch? Give it a new set of p
I tagged xml-commons module yesterday with tag name
'*before-jaxp13-upgradation*'.
I plan to do the following but i will wait till tomorrow so as to give
chance to the community
to correct me if i am doing something wrong.
* update javax.xml.*, org.xml.sax*, org.w3c.dom.* sources under
xml-com
Geir, I have uploaded sources at the same location
(xml-commons/contrib/jaxp13)
with Apache 2.0 license on every source file.
- Neeraj
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Ok, So i will add it and upload again.
- Neeraj
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Hi Neeraj,
Norman Walsh wrote:
> The XML Catalogs spec has been revised by the OASIS Entity Resolution
> Technical Committee. We've added two new entry types. As it turns out,
> one of them was the test case I used for extensibility, so it won't
> be hard to implement the new types :-)
Hello Norm, this is go
Ok, So i will add it and upload again.
- Neeraj
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Hi Neeraj,
I noticed that the JAXP 1.3 source files in jsr-206-src.zip have no
license on them. The JAXP 1.2 sources in xml-commons carry the Apache
license. Will this
On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Hi Neeraj,
I noticed that the JAXP 1.3 source files in jsr-206-src.zip have no
license on them. The JAXP 1.2 sources in xml-commons carry the Apache
license. Will this still be the case for JAXP 1.3?
yes - these files must be available under
Hi Neeraj,
I noticed that the JAXP 1.3 source files in jsr-206-src.zip have no
license on them. The JAXP 1.2 sources in xml-commons carry the Apache
license. Will this still be the case for JAXP 1.3?
Thanks.
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/05/2005 06:48:30 AM:
> Ok I just finishe