Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/17/2008 10:32:43 AM:
> On April 17, 2008 at 00:49, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
>
> > The change you're suggesting to resolveSystem() would break
compatibility.
> > It also doesn't fit with the semantics of the method though I'm sure
you
> > knew that befor
On April 17, 2008 at 00:49, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
> The change you're suggesting to resolveSystem() would break compatibility.
> It also doesn't fit with the semantics of the method though I'm sure you
> knew that before you suggested it. Any user of the resolver already has the
> power to c
