https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
--- Comment #6 from Michael Glavassevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-19
20:51:08 PST ---
They're a documented part of the API:
http://xml.apache.org/commons/components/apidocs/resolver/index.html. Users of
the resolver might be using t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
--- Comment #5 from Dylan Shearer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-19 20:41:32 PST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Yes SAX1 is deprecated, but the proposed patch makes backwards incompatible
> changes to the API. Deleting methods and interfa
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
--- Comment #4 from Michael Glavassevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-19
20:21:48 PST ---
Yes SAX1 is deprecated, but the proposed patch makes backwards incompatible
changes to the API. Deleting methods and interfaces from an API which
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
Dylan Shearer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22148|0 |1
is ob
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
Dylan Shearer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22147|0 |1
is ob
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
--- Comment #1 from David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-19 18:58:41 PST
---
Thanks. However could you please provide a new patch. Whatever text editor you
are using has made many text-formatting changes. Please only change the
n
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45240
Summary: Deprecated SAX API Used by SAXCatalogReader and
SAXCatalogParser
Product: XmlCommons
Version: 1.x
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
David Crossley wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> >
> > > I will try to configure Gump to run the tests that we have.
> >
> > Ping me if you need a hand.
>
> Thanks Stefan, i just finished adding that, so we will
> see how we go on Gump's next run.
Woops, i see from your
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>
> > I will try to configure Gump to run the tests that we have.
>
> Ping me if you need a hand.
Thanks Stefan, i just finished adding that, so we will
see how we go on Gump's next run.
-David
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recall that Norm asked here about further development. I thought
> that he received good response, but now he has gone elsewhere to
> start another one. Of course that is up to him. Thanks heaps for
> all of your work Norm.
+1
There have never been many developers contributing to Resolver,
and now there are starting to be more. So i think that the
community is gradually evolving. I am surprised that there is not
more activity - it is such an important tool.
I recall that Norm asked here about further development. I thou
11 matches
Mail list logo
