Re: Unable to build xml-commons website with Forrest 0.7

2009-12-16 Thread David Crossley
Michael Glavassevich wrote: > Tim Williams wrote: > > > > Without all the initial output from the build it's tough to say, but I > > wonder if you've run into a plugin version problem[1]. Would it be > > much trouble to upgrade to 0.8? I have no clue whether this would > > work or not with a 0.7

Re: Unable to build xml-commons website with Forrest 0.7

2009-12-16 Thread David Crossley
Michael Glavassevich wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > > One workaround to get the release published would be to disable > > the "PDF" production: > > In src/documentation/skinconf.xml disable-pdf-link = true > > In forrest.properties project.required.

Re: Unable to build xml-commons website with Forrest 0.7

2009-12-16 Thread David Crossley
Michael Glavassevich wrote: > > It's been a long time since I've tried building the XML Commons website and > I'm not sure how to get past this. I tried to build the site with a fresh > install of Forrest 0.7 (recommended in the build instructions on the XML > Commons website [1]) but had no luck.

assistance with Apache Forrest

2009-11-01 Thread David Crossley
I did some research to find the ASF projects that manage their websites with Apache Forrest, and am sending similar email to each project's dev mail list. Already sent to general at xerces and general at xml, but duplicates will not hurt. The purposes of this email are to remind people about some

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

2009-01-06 Thread David Crossley
Michael Glavassevich wrote: > Ralph Goers wrote: > > someone wrote: > > > > > > As part of the gradual shutdown of the XML project, the Xerces PMC has > > > agreed some time ago to take over the responsibility for XML Commons. > > > The xml-commons group which you mentioned is basically for committ

Re: Future of xml-commons-resolver development and maintenance

2008-06-24 Thread David Crossley
Michael Glavassevich wrote: > Earl Hood wrote: > > > > The revision number is bogus since it is based on the svn revision > > of the repo I imported that 1.2 source release. > > > > The diffs are against the released 1.2 source. If required, > > I can see if the diffs need to be redone against the

Re: Future of xml-commons-resolver development and maintenance

2008-06-23 Thread David Crossley
Earl, while reviewing some of your patches, i see that you appear to be using an old version of xml-commons. Your diffs say "revision 2813", yet the current revision (last change from mrglavas) is 669794. See the "Where can I get the source code?" section at http://xml.apache.org/commons/ i.e. htt

Re: Future of xml-commons-resolver development and maintenance

2008-06-19 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > David Crossley wrote: > > > > > I will try to configure Gump to run the tests that we have. > > > > Ping me if you need a hand. > > Thanks Stefan, i just finished adding that, so we will > see how

Re: Future of xml-commons-resolver development and maintenance

2008-06-19 Thread David Crossley
Stefan Bodewig wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > I will try to configure Gump to run the tests that we have. > > Ping me if you need a hand. Thanks Stefan, i just finished adding that, so we will see how we go on Gump's next run. -David

Re: Future of xml-commons-resolver development and maintenance

2008-06-19 Thread David Crossley
There have never been many developers contributing to Resolver, and now there are starting to be more. So i think that the community is gradually evolving. I am surprised that there is not more activity - it is such an important tool. I recall that Norm asked here about further development. I thou

Re: Suggested patches for resolver: Windows driver-letter paths and resolveSystem() and

2008-04-20 Thread David Crossley
Earl Hood wrote: > While working with xml-commons-resolver, I discovered that the code > does not handle pathnames that utilize window's driver letters. The code > appears to lose the "absoluteness" of the path, causing resolution of > other entities/files to fail that have it for a base. Earl, i

Re: Problems building the resolver documentation

2006-11-21 Thread David Crossley
Jeremias Maerki wrote: > The DocBook stylesheets don't seem to be in SVN, no. I have a local > install and when I adjust the path in src/documentation/sitemap.xmap, it > works for me. I think that Norm recently tweaked the build system so that it doesn't need Forrest to build that Resolver article

Re: [VOTE]: xml-commons-external-1.3.04 Release on Wednesday, November 22nd

2006-11-21 Thread David Crossley
I did some basic checks - general rather than technical. The Bin dist unpacks in a named directory, but the Src just unpacks in the current directory. Missing .sig files. I suppose that you will add these after. The KEYS file is not in the Src dist. +1, those things aren't enough to halt it. (I

Re: new xmlcommons and resolver release?

2006-09-13 Thread David Crossley
Michael Glavassevich wrote: > Norman Walsh wrote on 09/13/2006 11:39:43 AM: > > / Jacob Kjome was heard to say: > > | I'm wondering if a new release of xmlcommons can be expedited to allow > the > > | upcoming Xerces-2.8.1 release to include it in its distribution? > > > > Sounds good to me. If I

Re: [VOTE]: Fw: XML commons release

2006-09-13 Thread David Crossley
+1 to this as a basic release plan. We need the jars and tar.gz etc. to be able to vote on the releases. Who is going to prepare the release? -David Michael Glavassevich wrote: > (Forwarding a post from Gareth which hasn't shown up on the list yet. > Perhaps it's stuck in the moderation queue?)

Re: File URLs will be the death of me

2006-07-03 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: > Norman Walsh wrote: > > > > Could you try the patch I provided? I believe that I've plugged that > > hole. But I've also believed that before. > > At Apache Forrest i upgraded our resolver.jar to use > the current xml-commons trunk

Re: Support for external catalog files for Resolver 1.1?

2006-06-09 Thread David Crossley
Mitchell, Sara wrote: > I'm trying to use Resolver 1.1 from Ant with Xalan-j 2.7.0, so this may > be an Ant problem or a Xalan problem. > > The Xalan docs say that 2.7 supports URIRESOLVER and the Resolver 1.1 > docs say that this is what is needed. > > Ant docs say that an external catalog ca

Re: File URLs will be the death of me

2006-04-24 Thread David Crossley
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Alexander Pavlenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | Excuse me if I say obvious things but maybe it will help. > | > | "file" URLs usually should have one or three slashes following the scheme > | name, not two. > | > | file:/path - means missing authority part > |

Re: Multiple catalog files with apache xml common resolver in apache xerces

2005-12-08 Thread David Crossley
Andreas Grund wrote: > > I use the apache xerces parser to parse a great xml-file. This xml file is > splitted in serveral sub-files, which each has an individuel public id. This > id is resolved to the file name using the > org.apache.xml.resolver.tools.CatalogResolver class. As long as I use

Re: Insufficient karma?

2005-09-30 Thread David Crossley
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Thomas DeWeese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | You need to ssh into svn.apache.org and run svnpasswd to > | setup your svn password on the apache systems. > > Thanks! But that is why i provided you the links to committer information in my reply. Please make

Re: Insufficient karma?

2005-09-29 Thread David Crossley
The migration to Subversion happened a month or two ago. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-commons-dev&m=112258875702943 http://www.apache.org/dev/#svn http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn You should be able to just copy your changed files from your old CVS working copy to

Re: svn commit: r227312 - /xml/commons/trunk/README.html

2005-08-04 Thread David Crossley
Erk, sorry Jeremias. I probably should have removed that README.html long ago. It used to be the xml-commons website homepage. I moved all the content into a Forrest project. The source is at src/documentation/content/xdocs/ I left the README.html there because there were a few things that were no

update website for XML Commons

2005-06-26 Thread David Crossley
The instructions for updating the XML Commons website still use Forrest-0.5 http://xml.apache.org/commons/howto-forrest.html I have it working locally using the new Forrest-0.7 version. Soon i will update the Forrest configuration files and the instructions. I will also stop the build system from

Re: [VOTE] Migrate xml-commons from CVS to SVN

2005-06-21 Thread David Crossley
Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Taking Antonio's suggestion I'd like to call for a vote to migrate the > xml-commons CVS module to Subversion right after the externals release. > > CVS modules to be converted: > > * xml-commons (full conversion) > > Target URL: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xm

Re: CVS Resolver supports XML Catalogs 1.1

2005-05-06 Thread David Crossley
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Neil Graham was heard to say: > | > | Of the various components of xml-commons, I know Xerces-J only uses > | Resolver and XML-APIS at the moment; we don't use which, for instance. I > | think Xalan-J only uses XML-APIS. So it seems to me like it would make > | sense to

Re: failure of new entity resolver on some OS

2005-05-05 Thread David Crossley
Norman Walsh wrote: > / David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > | Here are the unsuccessful startup messages on Win ... > | (using Windows XP SP2 + Cygwin) > > What is in your CatalogManager.properties file? Not much at all. We load the main catalogs via pr

Re: failure of new entity resolver on some OS

2005-04-26 Thread David Crossley
Holliday, Donald (LNG-CSP) wrote: > I think I'm missing something. This is a Java tool yet for WinXP SP2 you > mention Cygwin. How is the new resolver dependent on Cygwin? What version > of the JRE is running on Windows? I was just mentioning the full details of the Operating System used by the

failure of new entity resolver on some OS

2005-04-24 Thread David Crossley
I recently added the new resolver to Apache Forrest. It works beautifully on UNIX, but one of our developers uses Win where it is a total failure. Here are the messages when the resolver starts sucessfully on UNIX ... -- Parse catalog: file:/svn/asf/forrest/main/webapp/resources/schema/catalo

Re: CVS Resolver supports XML Catalogs 1.1

2005-04-23 Thread David Crossley
; http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-commons/java/src/org/apache/xml/resolver/Catalog.java?r1=1.14&r2=1.15&diff_format=h > > David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/13/2005 11:24:39 PM: > > > Norman Walsh wrote: > > > I don't know how often the Comm

Re: CVS Resolver supports XML Catalogs 1.1

2005-04-14 Thread David Crossley
Norman Walsh wrote: > I don't know how often the Commons work is packaged up for release, > but I'd sure appreciate feedback from others about the stability of > the new code before it gets shipped off in a real release. XML Commons Resolver can be shipped separately. That is what we did with the

Re: pls set default Assign-to for xml-commons-dev

2005-04-14 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: > When people create/amend bugs in Apache XML Commons Bz, > then the email notifications never come to the > mailing list. Instead they go straight to specific > sole developers, so the rest of us don't realise > that issues have been raised. > >

pls set default Assign-to for xml-commons-dev

2005-04-14 Thread David Crossley
When people create/amend bugs in Apache XML Commons Bz, then the email notifications never come to the mailing list. Instead they go straight to specific sole developers, so the rest of us don't realise that issues have been raised. Please set the default for all Components in the Category XmlComm

Re: Resolver: process for a major rewrite?

2005-04-06 Thread David Crossley
Norman Walsh wrote: > The XML Catalogs spec has been revised by the OASIS Entity Resolution > Technical Committee. We've added two new entry types. As it turns out, > one of them was the test case I used for extensibility, so it won't > be hard to implement the new types :-) Hello Norm, this is go

Re: Resolver thread safety

2004-10-29 Thread David Crossley
l http://excalibur.apache.org/xmlutil/ so i presume that it is "thread safe". -- David Crossley

Re: SVN migration (Was: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache)

2004-10-21 Thread David Crossley
Neil Graham wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > > I was not intending that the two get tangled. > > Either do the move before or after. > > > > Just that when "legal delays" were mentioned, > > i thought that there would be plenty of time. >

SVN migration (Was: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache)

2004-10-20 Thread David Crossley
ll-trod path than be > on the bleeding edge in this particular instance. Apache Forrest was one of the early ones to move. The transition was a breeze and we love it now. We are mainly using the trunk, with small experimental branches which we merge early. Different to xml-commons. -- David Crossley

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

2004-10-19 Thread David Crossley
pository to SVN? -- David Crossley

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

2004-10-19 Thread David Crossley
Sarah McNamara wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > >One thing that we must have this time around, is a > >version number on the xml-apis.jar filename. [1] > >I suppose that is an Xml-commons "build" issue. > >By the way, that build system is seriously in need

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

2004-10-15 Thread David Crossley
I dropped most of the Cc because this part is now an issue for XML-Commons and the XML PMC. Neeraj Bajaj wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > One thing that we must have this time around, is a > > version number on the xml-apis.jar filename. [1] > > I suppose that is an Xml-

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

2004-10-14 Thread David Crossley
t worries me that we end up with copies. On related matters, there is past discussion, e.g. [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10673944592 -- David Crossley

Re: Source code I would like to submit.

2004-03-18 Thread David Crossley
steve.posick wrote: > I have some source code that I would like to release as open source, > whether it's part of this project or another. Maybe y'all can tell me > if this is the right place. > > The code I have is a number of classes designed to make the use of XML > as easy as using a prop

[Proposal] change the Reply-To header

2004-01-09 Thread David Crossley
I have been discussing the configuration of this commons-dev mail list with apmail. Apparently the current Reply-To header causes mail to go directly back to the poster, rather than coming to the list as one would expect. Since commons-dev is a very quiet list, i will wait for another week. If no-

Re: Resolver 1.1 JRE compatibility

2004-01-08 Thread David Crossley
e answers turn up, then we will add an FAQ about this. Sorry that i cannot help further, Perhaps someone more familiar with the Resolver code will answer. --David > -Original Message- > From: David Crossley > Holliday, Donald B. (LNG-CSP) wrote: > > With which versions o

Re: Resolver 1.1 JRE compatibility

2004-01-07 Thread David Crossley
Holliday, Donald B. (LNG-CSP) wrote: > With which versions of the JRE is Resolver 1.1 compatible? The Apache Cocoon and Apache Forrest projects use the Resolver-1.1 and ensure that it works for all recent JVMs. Personally i use it with Linux-Blackdown-1.4.1 and 1.3.1 What version are you interest

Re: Resolver quick start or tutorial wanted

2004-01-07 Thread David Crossley
t explains how to use the resolver > with XercesJ? > > Thanks, > > Donald Holliday Did you see the posting to general xml.apache.org mailing list and the documents mentioned therein? Repeated below ... --David On 2003-12-30 David Crossley wrote: > Dirk Verbeeck wrot

Commons confusion

2003-11-14 Thread David Crossley
I see the Apache Jakarta Commons project being referred to as "Apache Commons" or even just plain "Commons". Then there is the new "real" top-level Apache Commons project, whose home page mentions the confusion between it and Apache Jakarta Commons. but does not even mention Apache XML Commons. Th

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2003-09-07 Thread David Crossley
Shane Curcuru wrote: > > (For some reason, the nicely curved bottom border of the > search area has an extra square bar of light blue under it) It is fine for me on Linux Mozilla. What browser are you using? Does the same thing happen on other Forrested sites? > And any hints on how to rebuild

new xml-commons website is published

2003-09-07 Thread David Crossley
Grab a drink and celebrate the new website. http://xml.apache.org/commons/ --David

Re: [resolver] Question about resolving w3c Schemas

2003-09-06 Thread David Crossley
Mark R. Diggory wrote: > I'm looking for a good example of a catalog xml file that resolves w3c > schema's. I'm unsure about how to define such entries, is it similar to > the stylesheet entry which uses the uri element? I have often pondered this same thing. I found an old message in the archiv

Re: [resolver] More descriptive Catalog.properties file

2003-09-06 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: > Mark R. Diggory wrote: > > Here's hopefully a more detailed example of the properties file ... > That is a great idea Mark, i will add it to cvs and we can then fine tune. Thanks, i used your suggestion to start a new page called "Resolver

Re: Xml-commons logo

2003-09-06 Thread David Crossley
Many thanks to Nicola Ken for the brilliant logo. I chose the middle one and twiddled it to be less high. Beauty. --David -- Subject: Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest For the possible logos: http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/logos/xml-commons.html ---

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2003-09-05 Thread David Crossley
!) I had better hurry then, to maintain momentum. --David > Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > David Crossley wrote, On 05/09/2003 5.14: > > > > > Okay i have updated the draft website. > > > > > > I do not want any google l

Re: [resolver] Problems parsing catalog.

2003-09-05 Thread David Crossley
elease-notes document. --David > -thanks again, > Mark > > David Crossley wrote: > > > Mark R. Diggory wrote: > > > >>I'm hoping someone might be able to identify why this failure is > >>occuring when I'm parsing my catalog.xm

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2003-09-05 Thread David Crossley
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Okay i have updated the draft website. > > > > I do not want any google links to this draft, so please go to > > http://www.apache.org/ > > then go to ~crossley/commons-draft/ > > For the possible logos

Re: [resolver] Problems parsing catalog.

2003-09-05 Thread David Crossley
Mark R. Diggory wrote: > I'm hoping someone might be able to identify why this failure is > occuring when I'm parsing my catalog.xml file, it seems to be trying to > parse it as a text file... > > I've also included the catalog at the bottom of the page. Thanks for any > pointers. I have the s

Re: [resolver] More descriptive Catalog.properties file

2003-09-05 Thread David Crossley
Mark R. Diggory wrote: > Here's hopefully a more detailed example of the properties file with > comments/examples interspersed. Seems it would be wise to have good > example of this in the package. I found I had to dig through doc's to > find it (prior to the generated site, of course!). :-) T

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2003-09-05 Thread David Crossley
Okay i have updated the draft website. I do not want any google links to this draft, so please go to http://www.apache.org/ then go to ~crossley/commons-draft/ Would someone please look and see if there is any reason that we cannot go public soon. --David

Re: Resolver as EntityHandler example?

2003-09-05 Thread David Crossley
t he odd subject heading, I was actually going to ask a > different question when I started this email, I forget to change the > subject heading. Of course, there is a "Resolver as an entityhandler" > example is in the package documentation. > > -Mark > >

Re: Resolver as EntityHandler example?

2003-09-04 Thread David Crossley
Mark R. Diggory wrote: > Hello, > Is there actually a site with the generated documentation for the > resolver? I seem to be missing its location? Not yet. I am working as we speak on getting the xml-commons website happening properly. I am going to make a new demonstration of the work-in-progres

Re: some issues with docs: license review

2003-09-03 Thread David Crossley
Berin Lautenbach wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > Thanks Norm, i have applied the suggested changes to the > > resolver side of things. Waiting on the PMC for the other > > issues (4.5 down, 13.5 to go). > > Whoops. I've missed something here - many ap

Re: some issues with docs: license review

2003-09-02 Thread David Crossley
On 2003-07-11 Norman Walsh wrote: > David Crossley was heard to say: > | While trying to build the XML Commons website, i am running > | into quite a lot of issues. > | > | Licenses is one issue. I was first attracted by some tricky > | copyright bits in the Resolver documenta

Re: Conversion of Mainframe Flat File to XML

2003-08-15 Thread David Crossley
Murray, Bob wrote: > I'm trying to convert a mainframe flat file to XML format. How can I do > this? Thanks! Perhaps http://chaperon.sourceforge.net/ --David

Re: Resolver updated

2003-07-08 Thread David Crossley
On 2003-04-23, Norman Walsh wrote: > I've checked in some changes to the resolver. I'd appreciate feedback > from folks that can give it a try. > > The resolver now includes catalog.{dtd,rng,xsd} and uses a "bootstrap" > resolver when it's loading catalog files. That means that this catalog: > >

Re: roadmap for resolver 1.1 release?

2003-07-08 Thread David Crossley
Craeg K Strong wrote: > The ant-dev community is starting the planning process for an > Ant 1.6 release. Due to the xmlcatalog integration, there is now > a dependency between Ant and resolver. > > The Ant CVS currently depends on changes in the resolver CVS. > What are the plans for the resolv

some issues with docs: license review

2003-07-07 Thread David Crossley
While trying to build the XML Commons website, i am running into quite a lot of issues. Licenses is one issue. I was first attracted by some tricky copyright bits in the Resolver documentation, but ended up finding some discrepancies elsewhere too. I Cc the PMC so that they can help to ensure tha

Re: Where can I find the instruction of using xml-commons-resolver-1.0

2003-07-06 Thread David Crossley
Tomasz Kostyra wrote: > Hallo all > I am new at commons. I would like to learn about > xml-commons-resolver-1.0. Where can I find samples and documentation? We are still trying to get the xml-commons website documentation built properly. Anyway, you can find the raw documentation for resolver in

Re: Nomination of Shane Curcuru as xml-commons PMC rep

2003-02-12 Thread David Crossley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > +1 to Shane being the xml-commons PMC rep, I think he will do a great job, > both in terms of xml-commons and in helping things along in general at the > PMC level! Yikes sorry Ted, unless someone did it silently, then we forgot to summarise the vote and tell you the

Re: Xml-commons logo

2003-02-08 Thread David Crossley
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Attached is the xml-commons logo after the latest suggestions of some > time back. would it be ok? In the previous discussion, we said that we did not like the idea of an empty element. You had another example where the element was a container for the pipe - i rea

Re: Nomination of Shane Curcuru as xml-commons PMC rep

2003-02-07 Thread David Crossley
+1 for Shane to be the xml-commons PMC rep. Do we need only one rep? --David

Re: xml.apache.org refactoring #1 - expansion of PMC

2003-02-07 Thread David Crossley
commons project, all xml committers are commons > committers. > > My nominations for commons PMC rep would be either myself, David > (Crossley) or Ilene since we three are the most active here, and since > Ilene is already the Xalan PMC rep. Other suggestions welcome, of >

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2003-01-22 Thread David Crossley
en to get the xml-commons project more widely known. It is a shame that these excellent components are not being properly promoted. --David On 2002-12-20, David Crossley wrote: > Here is an outline of the progress with the website. > > *) Sent email to forrest-dev explaining some o

Re: New resolver all checked in

2002-12-20 Thread David Crossley
Brian Smith wrote: > Shane Curcuru/CAM/Lotus wrote: > >Brian Smith wrote: > >>(b) The resolver library does not have any special support for > >>resolving the public ID for the DTD for XML catalogs. Thus, if > >>you don't put that DTD in your local personal system-wide catalog, > >>the catalog reso

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-12-20 Thread David Crossley
Here is an outline of the progress with the website. *) Sent email to forrest-dev explaining some of the xml-commons needs. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=103967656107408 "website with separate distributable components" No responses yet, so just getting on with the job ... *) Add

Re: New resolver all checked in

2002-12-14 Thread David Crossley
Norman Walsh wrote: > Ok, I've checked in a whole raft of changes to the resolver code. I > don't think I've broken anything, and I have some new tests under > tests/resolver that demonstrate that my new code works (at least for > me :-) > > I'd appreciate feedback from anyone who can give it a w

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-20 Thread David Crossley
Following Shane's documentation commits today, i updated the draft website. http://cvs.apache.org/~crossley/commons/ We know that there are a few issues. I will try to gather them up and see what the Forrest list thinks about how those can be addressed. --David

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-16 Thread David Crossley
Shane Curcuru/CAM/Lotus wrote: > ---- David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I envisaged a "common" home page and some top-level docs, > > then separate sections for each thing that is distributed. > > Yup, we'll definitely need some overviews

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread David Crossley
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > >>David Crossley wrote: > > > > > > > >>>Sorry about the "xml-commons" logo. I snitched a colour > >>>from the edge of the

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread David Crossley
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Sorry about the "xml-commons" logo. I snitched a colour > > from the edge of the Apache feather and knocked up a > > quick-and-dirty PNG. > > I'll make something out of SVG and post it somewhere, then

Re: draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-15 Thread David Crossley
Shane Curcuru/CAM/Lotus wrote: > Wow, I was just about to redo xml-commons to be forrestized > - although I had planned to completely restructure it, since > the README.html that I created long ago kinds of sucks > (I don't feel bad about writing that since I wrote it in the > first place...). Wel

draft website for xml-commons using Forrest

2002-11-14 Thread David Crossley
Apache Forrest is almost due to make its first release. So i thought it was about time to start generating the xml-commons website using Forrest. See the draft at: http://cvs.apache.org/~crossley/commons/ Do not worry about the trail at the top. It looks strange because it is at a temporary locat

Re: CatalogResolver with crimson

2002-05-18 Thread David Crossley
Shane Curcuru/CAM/Lotus wrote: > Did you try any other variations on the exact URL for the file? I think to > be a legal absolute file: URL you need at least two slashes separating the > scheme file:// from the path portion (or three, I always forget). We recently needed to clarify the file: URLs

Re: updgrading the commons website

2002-02-10 Thread David Crossley
Shane_Curcuru wrote: > Wow! Someone on commons-dev besides me! Welcome. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I do have a couple of changes to make to README.html > > Did I miss something? 8-) No. I just found a few things that were confusing and i was going to try to tidy them up. Also, i saw

updgrading the commons website (was: [ANN] xml-commons-1.0.b2 'preview2' release posted)

2002-02-08 Thread David Crossley
ase explain how the changes will get onto the website after i have done the cvs commit. --David Crossley

Doctypechanger tool for xml-commons

2002-01-20 Thread David Crossley
l-apache-general&m=100509711916965&w=2 I would like to resurrect the discussion here and then i suppose that it needs a vote. Jeff, is that still appropriate? --David Crossley > Subject: Re: [vote] Accepting Entity Resolver Donation > From: Shane Curcuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Donating the entity/URI resolver code

2002-01-20 Thread David Crossley
no -1 and no 0) which includes committers from various projects. Davanum Srinivas 2001-11-29 Edwin Goei 2001-11-30 David Crossley 2001-12-03 Davanum Srinivas 2001-12-03 Arved Sandstrom 2001-12-03 Stefano Mazzocchi 2001-11-03 Norman Walsh 2001-12-04 Shane Curcuru 2001-12-21 Martin Stricker 2001-12

Re: Commons web site?

2001-12-12 Thread David Crossley
should stick with the document DTD and stylesheet that is currently used by other Apache XML projects. If they move to some other DTD/XSL, we will then be able to go with them. It would be nice to use Cocoon to build the docs, which is how Jakarta Avalon does it. --David Crossley On 2001-11-06

xml-commons charter -Was: xml-commons-which: new Which utility to replace EnvironmentCheck; Gump update request

2001-12-12 Thread David Crossley
hing that we can do to assist their uptake is a good thing. Anyway these topics are for other threads. The first task is to start getting the charter sorted. That will take a while and should not hold up any real work. (Would the next poster please fine-tune the email Subject.) --David Crossley

why is spam coming to commons-dev list

2001-12-08 Thread David Crossley
spam. We should shut it off early, before it gets so bad that we cannot do our work. --David Crossley