Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Attached is the xml-commons logo after the latest suggestions of some
> time back. would it be ok?
+1 (non-committer)
I like it!
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Linux Migration Project: http://www.linux-migration
e tools not directly used in
a xml.apache.org project. But storing these tools separated from the
cross-project code is fine with me.
IIRC we had this discussion already in Dec 2001 or Jan2002 and decided
that tools of broad use can be included in the xml-commons project.
Best regards,
Ma
intained only once. I guess
glue code wasn't a good wording, sorry.
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/
Tom Bradford wrote:
>
> Martin Stricker wrote:
> > A repository of XML and XSL tools, maybe called "xml-tools", should
> > be kept separate from xml-commons. I see xml-commons as a
> > inter-xml.apache.org project, and a tool collection definitely woul
to general@xml.apache.org *ducks and runs*
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> BartSays="Nobody reads these anymore."/>
So, why are you Reply-To-ing there? ;=D
Best regards,
Martin Stricker
--
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/
