Michael Glavassevich wrote:
A
diff [4] between the latest copies on the main branch and tck-jaxp-1_2_0
shows some other differences, most notably how the jaxp.properties file is
cached. The code on the main branch will read and cache the
jaxp.properties file once whereas on the tck-jaxp-1_2
Thanks Michael for catching this one. Yes [1] should be fixed.
Except for changes related to compile/runtime dependency on
JDK 1.4 what are the other changes ?
- Neeraj
Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Hi everyone,
A recently opened Bugzilla report [1] cites a fix for File to URI
conversion which
Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Hello everyone,
During the past week I spent some time having a look over the Xerces
portions of the JAXP 1.3 donation to get a feel of what work would be
required to integrate this code back into Xerces. In doing so I found a
number of issues which should probably b
Thanks Michael for looking into this. I will answer your queries later
in a day.
There are some which i can't answer and i will cc to the appropriate person
to keep the discussion going.
- Neeraj
Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Hello everyone,
During the past week I spent some time having a look ove
how the new API works
has been explained with code snippets and diagram.
New XPath APIs have also been explained. Article is available at
https://jaxp.dev.java.net/article/jaxp-1_3-article.html
- Neeraj
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Hello All,
xml-commons has been upgraded to JAXP 1.3 APIs.
If anyone could
Hello All,
xml-commons has been upgraded to JAXP 1.3 APIs.
If anyone could try and confirm that would be great.
- Neeraj
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
I tagged xml-commons module yesterday with tag name
'*before-jaxp13-upgradation*'.
I plan to do the following but i will wait till tomorrow so
pgrade
JAXP 1.1 --> JAXP 1.3
DOM2 --> DOM3
SAX2 --> (SAX) 2.0.2 (sax2r3)
* Make updated javax.xml.* , org.xml.sax.* , org.w3c.dom.* sources
available as xml-apis.jar.
Anything else i should take care ?
- Neeraj
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Geir, I have uploaded sources at the same location
(xm
Geir, I have uploaded sources at the same location
(xml-commons/contrib/jaxp13)
with Apache 2.0 license on every source file.
- Neeraj
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Ok, So i will add it and upload again.
- Neeraj
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Hi Neeraj
still be the case for JAXP 1.3?
yes - these files must be available under the apache license v2. And
the license grantor should be the one that adds it.
Sorry Neeraj :)
geir
Thanks.
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/05/2005 06:48:30 AM:
Ok I just finished uploading JAXP 1.3 s
Ok I just finished uploading JAXP 1.3 sources in
"*xml-commons/contrib/jaxp13"* directory.
There are 3 files, jsr-206-src.zip, xml-xerces.zip, xalan-src.zip which
corresponds to jaxp-api,
xerces & xalan sources respectively.
- Neeraj
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
That really sounds goo
then pick on the bits they
want/need)...yes, changes to xml-commons can be made ASAP (after
tagging the current code in the main trunk there) and it's upto the
xml xerces/xalan folks to start picking up stuff as/when they fit.
thanks,
dims
On Apr 4, 2005 1:07 AM, Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL P
s.jar shipped with Xerces and Xalan. I assume a
similar branch will exist for 1.3.
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/03/2005 03:40:57 AM:
Hello All,
I sent the mail below with JAXP 1.3 APIs source code attached as zip but
mail bounced back with the following message
technicalities of merging with in the
appropriate (Xml-commons, Xerces, Xalan)
community.
Let's upgrade to JAXP 1.3 :-)
- Neeraj
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Excellent news! Thank to Sun folk and Geir for picking up the bal
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Excellent news! Thank to Sun folk and Geir for picking up the ball
on this one.
Note: once the papers are in the Hallowed Halls, I presume that
Neeraj will get some consensus from xml-commons, xalan-dev, and
xerces-j
with actual code grant with in 2 days.
Best Regards,
- Neeraj
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Oct 19, 2004, at 1:40 AM, Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
This is an update to the existing code that is already there.
It is, I suppose, a new grant of software to an existing community,
s
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I worked on the some of the legal aspects with Eduardo, so going to
jump in here.
On Oct 13, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Hello All,
I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ?
Merging the code in branch/review
Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/13/2004 10:11:00 AM:
Hello All,
I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging
the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk
would take t
David Crossley wrote:
One thing that we must have this time around, is a
version number on the xml-apis.jar filename. [1]
I suppose that is an Xml-commons "build" issue.
By the way, that build system is seriously in need
of improvement,
This is something i can work with you when upgr
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Hello All,
I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ?
Merging the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk
would take time so at least from my side i would like to see this
work started as early as possible say from
only critical changes.
It would help merging the changes back to main
trunk. What do others think ?
Thanks,
Neeraj
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Ramesh Mandava wrote:
- Both Elliotte's and Clay's questions below are important. If someone
familiar with the code could comment on: For either the m
Ramesh Mandava wrote:
- Both Elliotte's and Clay's questions below are important. If someone
familiar with the code could comment on: For either the main trunk, or
a temporary working branch for integration:
-- What JVM's will this code compile on? Version/Vendors?
J2SE 1.4.x, J2SE 5.0 . We
21 matches
Mail list logo
