lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: CVS Resolver supports XML Catalogs 1.1
Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Neil Graham was heard to say:
> |
> | Of the various components of xml-commons, I know Xerces-J only uses
> | Resolver and XML-APIS at the moment; we don't
Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Neil Graham was heard to say:
> |
> | Of the various components of xml-commons, I know Xerces-J only uses
> | Resolver and XML-APIS at the moment; we don't use which, for instance. I
> | think Xalan-J only uses XML-APIS. So it seems to me like it would make
> | sense to
/ Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| Hi David and all,
|
| Of the various components of xml-commons, I know Xerces-J only uses
| Resolver and XML-APIS at the moment; we don't use which, for instance. I
| think Xalan-J only uses XML-APIS. So it seems to me like it would make
|
opment
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/22/2005 11:59 PM
To
Michael Glavassevich/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: CVS Resolver supports XML Catalogs 1.1
Michael Glavassevich
Michael Glavassevich wrote:
> On the subject of the 2.0 license, I noticed in a recent commit of the
> resolver code [1] an attribution notice was added to the bottom of the
> license text. Shouldn't this be placed in a NOTICE file rather than the
> source code?
That is right Michael. I had act
On the subject of the 2.0 license, I noticed in a recent commit of the
resolver code [1] an attribution notice was added to the bottom of the
license text. Shouldn't this be placed in a NOTICE file rather than the
source code?
Thanks.
[1]
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-commons/java/src
/ David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| I just updated the old Apache License headers to be
| Apache License 2.0 and added some missing ones.
| It is a new requirement that all releases must be so.
Ah, thanks. Sorry about that.
| The new resolver is working nicely for me in
| my
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:33 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> | The XML Catalogs spec has been revised by the OASIS Entity Resolution
> | Technical Committee. We've added two new entry types. As it turns out,
> | one of them was the test case I used
Norman Walsh wrote:
> I don't know how often the Commons work is packaged up for release,
> but I'd sure appreciate feedback from others about the stability of
> the new code before it gets shipped off in a real release.
XML Commons Resolver can be shipped separately.
That is what we did with the
/ Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| The XML Catalogs spec has been revised by the OASIS Entity Resolution
| Technical Committee. We've added two new entry types. As it turns out,
| one of them was the test case I used for extensibility, so it won't
| be hard to implement the new
10 matches
Mail list logo
