DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17569] - Include generated website in the distribution

2003-10-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17569] - Include generated website in the distribution

2003-10-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

PR #22654. Any progress?

2003-10-01 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Odi, Any progress on this one? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22654 Do you need a helping hand with it? Oleg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: EasySSLProtocolSocketFactory and IBM JRE 1.4.1

2003-10-01 Thread Kalnichevski, Oleg
Marcus, The EasySSLProtocolSocketFactory class is not intended to be used as is. This is precisely why the class sits in the '*.httpclient.contrib.ssl' package rather in the '*.httpclient.protocol' package proper. We strongly encourage the users to take 'contrib' classes as a starting point and

EasySSLProtocolSocketFactory and IBM JRE 1.4.1

2003-10-01 Thread Marcus Crafter
Hi All, Hope all is going well! I've just noticed that the EasySSLProtocolSocketFactory class in httpclient contrib imports some specific classes from the Sun JSSE implementation, which fails when using the IBM 1.4.1 JRE due to package name conflicts. eg. Sun JSSE has com.sun.net.ssl.SSLContext

RE: Prompting user for authentication?

2003-10-01 Thread David . Hay
No problem. Thanks for doing that... David -Original Message- From: Roland Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:24 AM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: RE: Prompting user for authentication? Hello David, I've taken the liberty to copy your mail as

Re: Prompting user for authentication?

2003-10-01 Thread Roland Weber
Ok, that was my misinterpretation. I'll remember next time. regards, Roland Ortwin Glück <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01.10.2003 10:40 Please respond to "Commons HttpClient Project" To: Commons HttpClient Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:Re: Prompting u

Re: Prompting user for authentication?

2003-10-01 Thread Ortwin Glück
Roland Weber wrote: Hello David, I've taken the liberty to copy your mail as a comment to the bug: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10794 to get the discussion starting. I want to add some comments of my own, and the discussion should be tracked with the bug. Please use the m

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10794] - User interaction for authentication

2003-10-01 Thread Ortwin Glück
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: public Credentials getCredentials( String realm, String host ); looks pretty much that way too. Even if you add port and authorization scheme and possibly the status code as additional arguments. Rather, define a class that holds such information and can be subclassed

RE: Prompting user for authentication?

2003-10-01 Thread Roland Weber
Hello David, I've taken the liberty to copy your mail as a comment to the bug: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10794 to get the discussion starting. I want to add some comments of my own, and the discussion should be tracked with the bug. regards, Roland [EMAIL PROTECTE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10794] - User interaction for authentication

2003-10-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10794] - User interaction for authentication

2003-10-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu