[ANNOUNCE] Release of Commons HttpClient 2.0 Release Candidate 3

The Jakarta Commons HttpClient development team is pleased to announce the release of HttpClient 2.0 RC3. This release consists primarily of bug fixes. Please visit the HttpClient website and download this latest release. The following changes h

[VOTE][RESULT] 2.0 RC3 release

The final vote was: 3 +1 Adrian, Me, Oleg 1 +0 Ortwin 3 +0 (Non-binding) Isabelle, Moh, Sam So, it looks like we are going to have a release. I should have something ready by the end of the day. Mike - To unsubscribe,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26070] - [RFE] Allow streaming of POST methods via chunked transfer encoding.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26070] - [RFE] Allow streaming of POST methods via chunked transfer encoding.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26070] - [RFE] Allow streaming of POST methods via chunked transfer encoding.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26070] - [RFE] Allow streaming of POST methods via chunked transfer encoding.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26070] - [RFE] Allow streaming of POST methods via chunked transfer encoding.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15297] - [HttpClient] Authenticator() - ability to perform alternate authentication

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15297] - [HttpClient] Authenticator() - ability to perform alternate authentication

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26070] - [RFE] Allow streaming of POST methods via chunked transfer encoding.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] 2.0 RC3 Release

Odi, Adrian, Thank you for responding. Sorry if I was being a little harsh. I will start working on a release tonight. Mike On Jan 16, 2004, at 2:01 AM, Adrian Sutton wrote: +1 Sorry for the delay, this is code freeze day for my paid work. :) So many +1s went by I lost track of how few ac

Re: 2.0rc3

On 16/1/04 7:31 PM, "Kalnichevski, Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All I need is to get my hands on a wirelog which I could use as a blueprint to > simulate authenticating NTLM proxy. Anyone with access to an authenticating > NTLM proxy on the list? I do and I've been meaning to run some tests

RE: 2.0rc3

All I need is to get my hands on a wirelog which I could use as a blueprint to simulate authenticating NTLM proxy. Anyone with access to an authenticating NTLM proxy on the list? Oleg -Original Message- From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 10:00 To

Re: [VOTE] 2.0 RC3 Release

+0 Sorry, I was out of office for three days... Odi Michael Becke wrote: I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH as RC3 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows: - To unsubscribe, e-ma

Re: [PATCH] deprecated HttpState#isAuthenticationPreemptive no longer has any effect

Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: Mike, I can't think of anything better than this hack. Any better ideas? That's fine with me. I had the same thing in mind. As long as it's only "basic" that supports preemtive auth, I see no need for a more complicated approach. Sometimes you have to be pragmatic...

Re: 2.0rc3

Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote: Plain (non-proxied) host NTLM authentication works fine. I have no access to authenticating NTLM proxy and thus unable to test NTLM proxy authentication. Feel free to use the local proxy implementation to simulate a request to a NTLM compliant server.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26070] - [RFE] Allow streaming of POST methods via chunked transfer encoding.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] 2.0 RC3 Release

+1 Sorry for the delay, this is code freeze day for my paid work. :) So many +1s went by I lost track of how few actual committers voted. Adrian Sutton. On 14/1/04 2:28 AM, "Michael Becke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH as > RC3