Re: @author tags

2004-03-10 Thread John Keyes
We had this same conversation on commons-dev. This does appear to be a contentious issue. Personally I don't really mind if my name appears in a file or not. I think it is all about the community. There is a difference between the developer and the contributor though. I think it is the

Re: streaming request body

2004-02-25 Thread John Keyes
On 25 Feb 2004, at 14:43, Ortwin Glück wrote: John Keyes wrote: My point here is that if I have X requests then there can be X * CONTENT_LENGTH_CHUNKED bytes in memory at one time. I see what you mean. But the above calculation does not make sense: CONTENT_LENGTH_CHUNKED is a (negative

Re: streaming request body

2004-02-24 Thread John Keyes
still don't see the problem. The OutputStream and InputStream can be wrapped so there is no loss of control. Why do you think control would be lost? -John K -Eric. John Keyes wrote: Guys, A colleague pointed out to me that this does not in fact resolve the situation. The solutions

Re: streaming request body

2004-02-24 Thread John Keyes
On 24 Feb 2004, at 14:36, Stefan Dingfelder wrote: John Keyes schrieb: For (a), Oleg's response is correct. You might easily be confused, in the sense that HttpClient's API inverts the control. It is not that you write to an OutputStream to send your data, it is that you provide HttpClient

Re: streaming request body

2004-02-24 Thread John Keyes
On 24 Feb 2004, at 14:39, Ortwin Glück wrote: John Keyes wrote: In both cases, it is possible to get the behavior that you desire. Not it is not. Again think of XXX,000 of requests. I am getting a little angry by now. C'mon man, we wrote this baby and we know very well what's possible

Re: streaming request body

2004-02-24 Thread John Keyes
lots_snipped/ Again, comments and feedback or a patch for bug 26070 would be welcome. Okay, I'll investigate it more and see what I come up with, -John K - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: streaming request body

2004-02-24 Thread John Keyes
to process around 70,000 requests a minute. -John K Oleg -Original Message- From: John Keyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 16:59 To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: Re: streaming request body On 24 Feb 2004, at 14:36, Stefan Dingfelder wrote: John Keyes

streaming request body

2004-02-23 Thread John Keyes
Hi, I notice you have separated out the functions of the connection and the content creation. So the code must be something like HttpClient client = new HttpClient( url ); HttpMethod method = new GetMethod(); method.setRequestHeader( ... ); ... method.setRequestBody( ... );

Re: streaming request body

2004-02-23 Thread John Keyes
-commons/ httpclient/src/examples/ChunkEncodedPost.java?content- type=text%2Fplainrev=1.4.2.1 Hope this helps Oleg -Original Message- From: John Keyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 13:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: streaming request body Hi, I notice you have

Re: streaming request body

2004-02-23 Thread John Keyes
/ChunkEncodedPost.java?content- type=text%2Fplainrev=1.4.2.1 Hope this helps Oleg -Original Message- From: John Keyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 13:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: streaming request body Hi, I notice you have separated out the functions