t credential
> - enable preemptive authentication on the HttpMethod
>
> The correct Authorization header will then be
> generated by the HttpClient. You don't have to
> care about the header format and base64
> encoding in the application.
>
> cheers,
> Roland
>
rst beta. Once we have the new
API
> agreed, we can think of a migration path which may involve a (1)
> compatibility layer, (2) manual code conversion, (3) automatic code
> conversion, (4) some combination of 1, 2, and 3.
>
> Oleg
>
>
> On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 08:09,
d/pwd in the HttpState as default credential
> - enable preemptive authentication on the HttpMethod
>
> The correct Authorization header will then be
> generated by the HttpClient. You don't have to
> care about the header format and base64
> encoding in the application.
&
nt not finding the required credentials. The way credentials
are
> set in the HTTP state has changed. Could you please give the code
> snippet containing calls to HttpState#setCredentials() method(s)? This
> method may be the cause of the problem.
>
> More tomorrow
>
> Oleg
It seems the attachment was stripped. I've uploaded it on:
http://cvs.apache.org/~vmassol/test_client.log
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 March 2004 00:30
> To: 'Commons HttpClient Project&#
Hi guys,
I've finally tracked down the Cactus gump build problem we've been
having for the past 2 weeks. It appears to be caused by some change in
commons-httpclient.
The build is working fine with version 2.0 and failing on some
authentication code with a commons-httpclient built from CVS HEAD.
tpClient Project
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Commons HttpClient 2.0 Final
>
> What are you using (plugin or ssh etc) to create the md5 checksum on
> your new jars?
>
> -Mark
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>
wrote:
> >>
> >>> Just to let you know, the update from java-repository to ibiblio
is
> >>> every 4 hours, if you just placed it there, wait at least that
> >>> amount of time before we look into issues.
> >>> -M.
> >>> Mark R. Diggory w
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 February 2004 04:14
> To: Commons HttpClient Project
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Commons HttpClient 2.0 Final
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Thanks for adding the jar to ibiblio. I added the jar to
> '/www/ww
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 February 2004 14:20
> To: Commons HttpClient Project
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Commons HttpClient 2.0 Final
>
> Ok, 2.0 it is. This will require that I regenerate the distribution.
> I should be a
FYI, I have uploaded the 2.0-final version to Ibiblio:
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/commons-httpclient/jars/commons-httpclient-
2.0-final.jar
BTW, I'm curious to know why it is called 2.0-final and not simply 2.0.
I have not seen this versioning in use in other places. This is also not
the versio
Non-binding +1 to both suggestions.
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 October 2003 09:13
> To: Commons HttpClient Project
> Subject: Re: cactus-13-1.5-rc and commons-httpclient-2.0-rc2.jar works
on
> jdk1.4 and above only?
>
>
Thanks Michael. I'll ask Ajay to try it.
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 October 2003 06:25
> To: Commons HttpClient Project
> Subject: Re: cactus-13-1.5-rc and commons-httpclient-2.0-rc2.jar works
on
> jdk1.4 and above only?
>
> I'
e: FW: cactus-13-1.5-rc and commons-httpclient-2.0-rc2.jar
> workson jdk1.4 and above only?
>
> On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 21:54, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've released Cactus 1.5-rc1 last week end. I bundle
commons-httpclient
> > 2.0 rc2 in it. I'v
Hi,
I've released Cactus 1.5-rc1 last week end. I bundle commons-httpclient
2.0 rc2 in it. I've just received this email below from a cactus user.
Is it true, as Ajay says, that commons-httpclient would only work on JDK
1.4 onwards (see end of email below)?
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Messa
Hi Oleg,
> -Original Message-
> From: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 September 2003 22:38
> To: Commons HttpClient Project
> Cc: Vincent Massol
> Subject: RE: Release date for httpclient 2.0 final?
>
> Vincent,
>
> Truth to be tol
> 2.0 by end of September.
Ok. Thats some good piece of information.
Thanks
-Vincent
>
> Regards
>
> Odi
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm finishing a book on unit testing java applications (JUnit in
> > Action).
Hi,
I'm finishing a book on unit testing java applications (JUnit in
Action). I'm using Cactus in some chapters, which in turn uses
Commons-httpclient. The version of httpclient I'm using in the book is
currently 2.0-rc1. However, in anticipation of a future final release of
2.0, I've taken the ri
Hi Oleg,
> -Original Message-
> From: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 July 2003 23:02
> To: Vincent Massol
> Subject: RE:cvscommit: jakarta-
>
commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclientTestAuthenticat
or
> .javaTestHttpSta
> -Original Message-
> From: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 July 2003 17:57
> To: Commons HttpClient Project
> Subject: RE: cvscommit: jakarta-
>
commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclientTestAuthenticat
or
> .java TestHttpState.javaTestHttps.java Te
Thanks Michael for you answer. Cactus is being built using Gump every
day so whenever something breaks in HttpClient, be sure we'll be there
to help prevent any incompatibility :-)
We always try to follow the deprecation hints and upgrade as we go. What
is bad it when it breaks suddenly, which is
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 July 2003 13:46
> To: Commons HttpClient Project
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-
> commons/httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient
> TestAuthenticator.java TestHttpState.java TestHttps.java
>
t;
> HttpConstants#HTTP_ELEMENT_CHARSET - HTTP element encoding
> HttpConstants#DEFAULT_CONTENT_CHARSET - Default content encoding
>
> I hope this helps
>
> Cheers
>
> Oleg
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 13:37, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Hi,
> &
Hi,
In Cactus land (which uses HttpClient), I have received a bug report for
supporting different encodings
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17077). Up until now,
Cactus was using the default platform encoding for reading data from
streams. However, the bug reporter (Neal) who is
24 matches
Mail list logo
