Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-10-01 Thread Dion Gillard
Oleg, after adding codec as another dependency and upgrading to 3.0-alpha2, the jelly taglibs were all still working. HTH, On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:50:59 +1000, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oleg, I do care. I've just unfortunately been moving offices, had servers offline, had a

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-30 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Hi St.Ack, Your feedback is really appreciated. I am quite happy that we now have one less development list to spam ;) See my comments inline The upgrade took way longer than I anticipated, a couple of days rather than a couple of hours. While some of the time was spent on refactoring

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-30 Thread stack
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: We have already had a few reports regarding IBM JSSE semantical incompatibilities with Sun JSSE. It appears IBM JSSE implementation unlike Sun's does not like attempts to set socket parameters when the socket is closed. I believe it is clearly a bug in IBM JSSE but we can

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-30 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
That'd be grand if its possible (We like the IBM JVMs' speed and more detailed thread dumps). We used to subclass httpclient so we could do the below, moving the setting of the timeout till after the open. HttpClient 3.0 now sets timeout, etc., after the open seemingly so our subclass

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-30 Thread stack
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: ... St.Ack, Could you retest HttpClient 3.0a3 with IBM JRE and let us know if the problem still persists? No problem. Soon as its available. } public int execute(HttpState state, HttpConnection conn) throws HttpException, IOException { return

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-29 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Eric, The intention is to keep HttpClient 3.0 compile-compatible with HttpClient 2.x (except for all that ugly stuff that has been deprecated in 2.0). Feel free to submit a patch for the HttpException class. Keep us posted on the progress Cheers, Oleg On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 21:10, Eric Johnson

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-29 Thread Michael Becke
Hi St.Ack, Many thanks for taking the time to make such a detailed response. I haven't had time to fully digest (no pun intended) your message, but I'll take a look at it again in the morning. In the mean time I've added Heritrix to the applications page in CVS, which will be added to

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-28 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 22:50, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: As far as I know the following projects rely on HttpClient 2.0 as a required or optional dependency * Apache Jakarta Slide (http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/) * Apache Jakarta Cactus (http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/) *

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-28 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Thanks, Adam Should we decide to go on a spamming spree, these may also become potential victims ;-) Oleg On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 20:37, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 22:50, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: As far as I know the following projects rely on HttpClient 2.0 as a

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-28 Thread Michael Becke
I have no problem with posting to the dev lists for these other projects. My feeling is that we should keep it friendly and just encourage people to have a look at 3.0 and then submit their requests/ideas to httpclient-dev or bugzilla. Once we've done that I think we'll just have to be happy

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-27 Thread Dion Gillard
Oleg, I do care. I've just unfortunately been moving offices, had servers offline, had a firewall issue etc etc. I should get to testing 3.0 with jelly rsn On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:43:56 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sadly, no one seems to care. What do we do? Oleg

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-21 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
I apologize for forgetting about Maven and Jelly. Are there any plans to evaluate HttpClient 3.0? We are trying to get some feedback about the new 3.0 API before the call the API freeze. Oleg On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 03:07, Dion Gillard wrote: Jelly and Maven both use httpclient. On Mon, 20

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-21 Thread Dion Gillard
Jelly is going through a 1.0 release at the moment, but I think it's worth looking at it before then. On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:56:21 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I apologize for forgetting about Maven and Jelly. Are there any plans to evaluate HttpClient 3.0? We are trying

ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-20 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
As far as I know the following projects rely on HttpClient 2.0 as a required or optional dependency * Apache Jakarta Slide (http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/) * Apache Jakarta Cactus (http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/) * Apache Axis (http://ws.apache.org/axis/) * Apache XML-RPC

Re: ATTN Open-source projects using HttpClient

2004-09-20 Thread Dion Gillard
Jelly and Maven both use httpclient. On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:50:20 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as I know the following projects rely on HttpClient 2.0 as a required or optional dependency * Apache Jakarta Slide (http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/) * Apache Jakarta