Re: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release

2004-05-14 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
+1 On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 01:32, Michael Becke wrote: I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HEAD as 3.0 alpha 1 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows: -- Vote: HttpClient 3.0 alpha 1

Re: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release

2004-05-14 Thread Ortwin Glück
-0 I would like to see issue http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28728 fixed first. Odi Michael Becke wrote: I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HEAD as 3.0 alpha 1 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows:

Re: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release

2004-05-14 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Odi, The sole purpose of 3.0 alpha1 release to get people look at the API and give us some feedback on how it is shaping up. Alpha1 release is hardly expected to be bug free I really can't see why #28728 should be a release blocker Oleg On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 09:01, Ortwin Glück wrote: -0 I

Re: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release

2004-05-14 Thread Ingo Brunberg
Excuse me for being interfering, but why not fix it first as you already have an excellent solution for this from HttpURL. You just have to apply it to HttpsURL, too (without change). Regards, Ingo Odi, The sole purpose of 3.0 alpha1 release to get people look at the API and give us some

Re: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release

2004-05-14 Thread Ortwin Glück
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: Odi, The sole purpose of 3.0 alpha1 release to get people look at the API and give us some feedback on how it is shaping up. Alpha1 release is hardly expected to be bug free I really can't see why #28728 should be a release blocker Oleg Oleg, I agree it's not a

Re: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release

2004-05-14 Thread Thorsten Scherler
Ortwin Glück wrote: I agree it's not a release blocker. I don't wanna be a dick here. It is just a bug that requires nearly no effort to fix. So why not include the fix in alpha. Hello list, so if it takes nearly no effort to fix, why not fix that bug and then do the release? Just a thought

Re: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release

2004-05-14 Thread Ortwin Glück
+0 with the patch for #28728 that was just committed. cheers Odi Michael Becke wrote: I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HEAD as 3.0 alpha 1 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows: -- Vote:

Re: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release

2004-05-14 Thread Adrian Sutton
With that all dealt with: +1 :) On 14/05/2004, at 7:50 PM, Ortwin Glück wrote: +0 with the patch for #28728 that was just committed. cheers Odi Michael Becke wrote: I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HEAD as 3.0 alpha 1 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows:

RE: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release

2004-05-14 Thread Rezaei, Mohammad A.
+0 Thanks Moh -Original Message- From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 7:32 PM To: Commons HttpClient Project Subject: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HEAD as 3.0 alpha 1 and proceed with a release.

Re: [VOTE] 3.0 alpha 1 release

2004-05-13 Thread Michael Becke
+1 On May 13, 2004, at 7:32 PM, Michael Becke wrote: I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS HEAD as 3.0 alpha 1 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows: --- --- Vote: HttpClient 3.0 alpha 1 release [ ] +1