:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 13.45 PM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: Not giving ourselves enough credit on the home page
Hey Juergen,
Could you give us more of an update on what is happening with Slide and
HttpClient? I see that the original httpclient package
Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 18.54 PM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: Re: Not giving ourselves enough credit on the home page
Eric Johnson wrote:
[ ... ]
Someone posted recently that HttpClient appears to be faster than the
corresponding Sun solution
Mike Moran wrote:
http://www.innovation.ch/java/HTTPClient/urlcon_vs_httpclient.html
Interesting fact:
Oracle is using this library for their application server. They ship it
also with the Oracle 9i Client. It can be found in
$ORACLE_HOME/lib/http_client.jar.
Maybe one day they will change t
All good points. I had not yet had a chance to update those documents.
Its great to have input from everyone as the content is the hardest part.
I created a bug report for it and am refrencing back to this mail thread.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16625
BTW: anyone can subm
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 18.54 PM
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject:Re: Not giving ourselves enough credit on the home page
Eric Johnson wrote:
[ ... ]
>
> Someone posted recently that HttpClient appears to be faster than the
> corresponding Sun
I was always under the impression that the
Sun's Brazil small footprint HTTP stack is a
fast implementation in Java.:
http://research.sun.com/brazil/
One could also go beyond Java (e.g. libwww
or LibWWW or ...)
Otis
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Mike Moran
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Johns
Eric Johnson wrote:
[ ... ]
Someone posted recently that HttpClient appears to be faster than the
corresponding Sun solution.
I don't think Sun's is the one to beat. The innovation.ch one is not
bad, though getting pretty old. You may want to do a comparison with
what the jakarta one can do
