gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.0 Final
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-27 09:29 ---
Odi, All I am saying is that HttpParams _might_ be a better place for proxy
settings, as HostConfiguration is getting a little too messy IMO. I am not
trying to say t
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-27 07:11 ---
Oleg,
Proxy settings are 'manual routing' on the application layer of the protocol
stack. Therefore proxy settings must remain a per host property in any ca
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-26 18:20 ---
Just one comment, please keep in mind those of us that use multi-homed hosts.
There can be times where traffic on one NIC will require use a a proxy where
traffic di
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-25 22:43 ---
That's the point. I can't help thinking that proxy settings do not really belong
to HostConfiguration at all, as one would very rarely need to change proxy on
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-25 22:19 ---
Whatever's easiest for you folks is fine for us. We're going to continue using
a customized version of HttpClient for the indefinite future, so it doesn'
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-25 22:06 ---
I agree that this probably won't make it in until the release after next (4.0). In
the mean time we could
refactor it into a stand-alone Socket factory and in
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Mil
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-15 22:39 ---
Credit for the previous diff goes to Sumeet Thadani, another developer on our team.
-
To unsubscr
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-15 22:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=11253)
example diff from a modified 2.0rc2
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28421
Per socket SOCKS proxies
Summary: Per socket SOCKS proxies
Product: Commons
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
Priority: Other
Com
ient
side SOCKS support if there is no way to make use of the built-in
methods.
Mike
On Apr 14, 2004, at 1:04 PM, Sam Berlin wrote:
Hi All,
The website states the SOCKS proxies are supported by the setting the
native java properties that convert Sockets to using SOCKS internally.
Unfortuna
that uses SOCKS.
cheers,
Roland
Sam Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
14.04.2004 19:04
Please respond to "Commons HttpClient Project"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: SOCKS Proxies
Hi All,
The website states the SOCKS proxies are supporte
Hi All,
The website states the SOCKS proxies are supported by the setting the
native java properties that convert Sockets to using SOCKS internally.
Unfortunately, this solution is not possible for us, as we need to be
able to create Sockets sometimes with and sometimes without SOCKS.
How
14 matches
Mail list logo
