Something like that (review before uploaded media is public) I
believe is already being taken into consideration by the Usability
Initiative.
However I don't quite see what that has to do with the subject ;-)
It's not about preventing data from getting onto Commons. The warning
is not an
Tim, thank you for this excellent post. A few comments:
Tim Starling writes:
it's only the libertarians who value educational value above
moral hazard
I don't really agree with this. Contributors from across your
spectrum consider whether potentially-harmful information about a
person is
I've been reading all the discussion that have abounded across Commons, en
and the lists, and think that the reations are doing more harm than the
images themselves. The concern I'm seeing with warnings is that they will
encroach into areas that they were never intended, they dont actually do
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Gnangarra gnanga...@gmail.com wrote:
Really all we need to do is impliment a review process for uploaded media
that way we address not only scope but copyright, derivative wroks, FOP,
permission and licensing issues before the image is available for use,
