But. there's no reason why the two should be technically separated. It's
already been practically divided by categories. It's not considered
unnecessary faff just by techs; any pragmatic person would agree.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:03 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 1 February 2011 23:41, Gnangarra
On 1 February 2011 23:41, Gnangarra wrote:
> Why would these images even need a wiki, these images are the property of
> the foundation if they are such a big concern to Commons Community, (I've
> been on common for a few years and was not aware of real concerns about
> those images) then the Fou
Why would these images even need a wiki, these images are the property of
the foundation if they are such a big concern to Commons Community, (I've
been on common for a few years and was not aware of real concerns about
those images) then the Foundation should address the issue.
Why start a "proje
Wait, so we're moving a few 100 files, creating a new project, and adding
onto the burden of our already overworked technical team so we can remove
two sentences from project policy? The "staying true to our colors"
reasoning sounds obsessive-compulsive.
I'll ask again because I may very well be m
If it's only for Wikimedia copyrighted logos/files, you have my support.
2011/2/1 Teofilo
> 2011/2/1 Teofilo :
> > 2011/2/1 David Gerard :
> >> On 1 February 2011 08:59, Alex Brollo wrote:
> >>> 2011/2/1 Alex Brollo
> >
> >>
> >> There would be a push to expand it to fair use. I would call thi
2011/2/1 Teofilo :
> 2011/2/1 David Gerard :
>> On 1 February 2011 08:59, Alex Brollo wrote:
>>> 2011/2/1 Alex Brollo
>
>>
>> There would be a push to expand it to fair use. I would call this a
>> bad idea myself. Fair use should stay deprecated IMO, not encouraged
>> with a central repository.
>
2011/2/1 David Gerard :
> On 1 February 2011 08:59, Alex Brollo wrote:
>> 2011/2/1 Alex Brollo
>
> There would be a push to expand it to fair use. I would call this a
> bad idea myself. Fair use should stay deprecated IMO, not encouraged
> with a central repository.
I think it is better to crea
I guess it would be just on edit to add a second "commons" to all 700 wiki's
because of the shared settings. That wouldn't take much time.
Best,
Huib
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/c
On 1 February 2011 08:59, Alex Brollo wrote:
> 2011/2/1 Alex Brollo
>>> Moving those files into a new website sounds as a good idea. Are all the
>>> contents in German or Polish language? I'll like to come and take a look as
>>> soon as the new website will run, but I can't understand those lang
2011/2/1 Alex Brollo
>
> Moving those files into a new website sounds as a good idea. Are all the
>> contents in German or Polish language? I'll like to come and take a look as
>> soon as the new website will run, but I can't understand those languages. I
>> guess, many contents - even if covered
2011/2/1 Alex Brollo
>
>
> 2011/2/1 Teofilo
>
> Allrightsreserved is a new website proposed for the purpose of hosting
>> contents currentlty tagged with commons:Template:Copyright by
>> Wikimedia, commons:Copyright by Wikimedia Deutschland and
>> commons:Template:Copyright by Wikimedia Polska a
2011/2/1 Teofilo
> Allrightsreserved is a new website proposed for the purpose of hosting
> contents currentlty tagged with commons:Template:Copyright by
> Wikimedia, commons:Copyright by Wikimedia Deutschland and
> commons:Template:Copyright by Wikimedia Polska and hosted at Wikimedia
> Commons.
12 matches
Mail list logo
