UploadWizard is currently not used by experienced uploaders for a number
of reasons, among which is that they can't use some custom wikitext
licenses. We'd like to address that.
I made a mockup of a possible implementation. Comments welcome,
especially on balancing usability versus convenience
"Authority control" refers to controlled (i.e. curated, edited) list of
authorities: i.e. authors of works. The issue, then, is metadata that
links an image on Commons to the information about the subject in the
catalogue of the relevant museum or art gallery.
Jarek is working on templates to mak
Your stupid!
Am 16.09.2011 12:39, schrieb emijrp:
> Hi all;
>
> There are more issues with images in German Wikipedia.
>
> It is funny how German Wikipedia doesn't allow images[1] (image added by
> me[2] in de:, and later removed by other[3]) because they follow the most
> restrictive copyright
Am 16.09.2011 11:42, schrieb Rama Neko:
What motives this rejection? Has the nature of the filter been
understood? Do people fear a creep towards censorship? Something else?
-- Rama
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://l
What motives this rejection? Has the nature of the filter been understood?
Do people fear a creep towards censorship? Something else?
-- Rama
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
On 16 September 2011 10:03, Gnangarra wrote:
> While it maybe the position of a single recognisable group of editors that
> the filter isnt wanted. Its undeniable that the opinion of all editors
> irregardless of their background that there is a consensus that a filter
> system is wanted
Citati
On 16 September 2011 10:21, David Gerard wrote:
> On 16 September 2011 10:03, Gnangarra wrote:
>> While it maybe the position of a single recognisable group of editors that
>> the filter isnt wanted. Its undeniable that the opinion of all editors
>> irregardless of their background that there is
Am 16.09.2011 11:03, schrieb Gnangarra:
/
/
/While it maybe the position of a single recognisable group of editors
that the filter isnt wanted. Its undeniable that the opinion of all
editors irregardless of their background that there is a consensus
that a filter system is wanted
/
Wow. What
*Just an observation, individual responses to questions are my opinion only
*
On 16 September 2011 16:08, Tobias Oelgarte
wrote:
> Dear readers
>
> The questions are:
> * Will the board or the WMF proceed with the introduction of the
> personal image filter against the will of it's second largest
That is an unexpected outcome. Do we have any idea of the proeminent
arguments for rejecting the filter ?
-- Rama
On 16 September 2011 10:08, Tobias Oelgarte
wrote:
> Dear readers
>
> Yesterday, on September 15th 2011, the German Wikipedia closed the poll
> (Meinungsbild) "Einführung persönlich
Dear readers
Yesterday, on September 15th 2011, the German Wikipedia closed the poll
(Meinungsbild) "Einführung persönlicher Bildfilter". [1] It asked the
question if the personal image filter can be introduced or if it should
not be introduced.
A strong majority of 86% percent voted to not al
11 matches
Mail list logo
