Am 17.09.2011 05:54, schrieb Neil Kandalgaonkar:
UploadWizard is currently not used by experienced uploaders for a number
of reasons, among which is that they can't use some custom wikitext
licenses. We'd like to address that.
I made a mockup of a possible implementation. Comments welcome,
*What kind of license would you expect to be included?
*
sarcasm I don't know, maybe one of the hundred licenses listed here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_tags / sarcasm
_
*Béria Lima*
http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer
Op 16-9-2011 10:18, Rama Neko schreef:
That is an unexpected outcome. Do we have any idea of the proeminent
arguments for rejecting the filter ?
-- Rama
I don't think it's unexpected. It's actually the kind of outcome I would
expect when you would run this poll at the Dutch Wikipedia.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Tobias Oelgarte
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
The more licenses we
allow, the more difficult will be the reusing. (A book with 50 license
texts in the appendix?)
I recommend you take a look at the last line of the {{self}} template. Which
is *You
Oh well, I might interpreted wrongly. Anyway, what about, at least, hundreds
of PD templates?
Best,
[[User:Bencmq]] / Benjamin Chen
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Benjamin Chen cnchenmi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Tobias Oelgarte
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com
