for
RotateBot?
Thanks.
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar |) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ( ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons
://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
.
- d.
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar (| ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l
seem to prefer all rights reserved images
(including this blog post), or they don't care.
Nemo
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar (| ne
make me work harder to take
more photos upload more to Commons!
Hell yes!
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar (| ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
, they don't have every license that Wikimedia
Commons uses.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar (| ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
There aren't a lot of other bugs fixed at this moment -- rest assured
they are on the agenda...
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar |) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
seem as concerned
about the real incidents of censorship on our projects.
+1000
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar |) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
interest.
It's possible to make erotic images in this genre that are worth
defending, even as candidates for the Main Page, but this certainly
wasn't one of them, IMHO.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar |) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l
that the captions are now all wrong in other languages --
some of them were updated in the meantime to reflect the Amazonian image.)
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar |) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org
Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational
purpose: [...]
* Self-created artwork without obvious educational use.
QED.
Someone else cross-post this to Foundation-L... I have assiduously
avoided subscribing there and don't plan to now.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ( ) ne
or
unofficially, they can start to take that role too seriously or become
captured by various radical factions. But I guess we have to take that
chance.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ( ) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https
CENSORED or DAMN YOU
AMERICANS AND YOUR BLUENOSE STANDARDS I'm going to have to file you in
the troll folder.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ( ) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
to be have something that can go live to many users by the
end of this month. See the other post I'm making about UploadWizard's
release.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https
project to you?
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
contact the uploaders in question, if
possible, and just ask them what they thought they were doing? (I'm
assuming most copyvio is done in good faith).
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l
that this rapidly gets kind of hard, and
definitely hard to support in all our target browsers.
Anyway if you see easy answers to all this, please post them here...
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l
could be nicer. The tone of its messages could
be improved, but more importantly, we need to reduce the need for there
to even be nagging messages.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ( ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar (| ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https
not clear to me that this brings the wrong
audience to Wikimedia projects. It's not like this site is a secret or
anything. ;)
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https
the
various share icons into one popup is probably the most extensible /
least annoying.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
decisions about tools. I myself have
raised questions about (for instance) our decision to never use Flash,
even if we use a 100% free toolchain.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar |) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https
://www.mail-archive.com/wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org/msg08550.html
On 9/17/10 2:25 PM, Michael Dale wrote:
On 09/17/2010 12:24 PM, Neil Kandalgaonkar wrote:
Discussions about using closed source tools are not taboo. Not at all, I
think we should continue to review decisions about tools. I myself
be working on - how can we fund the
software we want to have - rather than looking for some compromise with
proprietary software, which we know will come back to haunt us.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar |) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l
On 9/16/10 11:02 AM, Neil Kandalgaonkar wrote:
Also, if we know that all of our software and data can be replicated
without limit
Oh and I forgot a very large benefit: this greatly reduces our exposure
to any lawsuits based on software or patents.
Anyway, I know you are really just advocating
to the image page at
Commons.
This would be a great way to promote reuse of our content!
Maarten
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar (| ne
users set a preferred license for their
own uploads, where it's their own work.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar |) ne...@wikimedia.org
___
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
even finished uploading this one. If it turns
out that we have to ask them about this explicitly, I'd rather leave
that to the end of the process.
[1] http://commons.prototype.wikimedia.org/ -- this is JUST a prototype,
we're changing a lot
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar |) ne...@wikimedia.org
/
In my view there isn't anything that Flickr is doing which Commons
couldn't be doing. And as much as I have faith in the Flickr team, I
have doubts about whether Yahoo is the right place, long term, for the
world to be relying on for such resources.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org
. (It's unclear to me whether metadata like the astrotags is
also CC-licensed.)
FYI, as mentioned above, I used to work at Flickr and had a stint in the
rest of Yahoo as well. Those blog posts of mine that I linked to were on
the Flickr developer blog.
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org
31 matches
Mail list logo