On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Rama Neko wrote:
> For the "Show respect" thing, I'd go as far as saying something to the
> effect of
>
> "do not photograph if it is not allowed, do not use you flash, do not
> attempt in any way to 'steal' photographs, as the quality will be poor
> and the short-t
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Stephen Bain wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Chris McKenna wrote:
>>
>> Actaully, I think it has made the absolutely right choice - to stick to
>> it's founding principle of being not censored.
>
> Well actually, the founding principle is giving everyone
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> So you're arguing that the woman is topless in order to conform to realistic
> portrayals of indigenous people? That's the biggest pile of bullshit I've
> heard in years.
>(...)
>
> ___
> Commons-l
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Huib! wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't see why it should be reported, I mean MediaWiki makes it
> possible for other wiki's to hotlink Wikimedia Content.
>
> When Wikimedia doesn't allow or support hotlinking the should have
> disabled it serverside.
>
>
>
Indeed
http:/
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Dror Kamir wrote:
>
> corruption here. There is a strong feeling as if the Commons took a
> political stand, not only by hosting these cartoons, but also by the way
> they are categorized, and by banning opposite opinions.
Don't play the censorship card. No opini
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Dror Kamir wrote:
> This discussion was probably discussed before. It has to be discussed
> again. I would like the members of this list to express their opinion
> about the following:
>
>
Why it has to be discussed again if it' has been discussed before?
Should we
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Cary Bass wrote:
> Mike.lifeguard a écrit :
> > Some time ago, I suggested using Meta for this purpose. That would be
> > the best solution; the second-best being to use Commons and expanding
> > the scope to chapter logos and the like (as I suggested already:
> >
