Sage Ross schreef:
Yes, but the CC-BY-SA license is also (usually understood as) a
contract. I don't think the IOC is arguing that Giles doesn't own the
copyright to his photos. But agreeing to terms and conditions is
different from walking past a no photos sign. Contracts can be
broken,
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl wrote:
Sage Ross schreef:
Yes, but the CC-BY-SA license is also (usually understood as) a
contract. I don't think the IOC is arguing that Giles doesn't own the
copyright to his photos. But agreeing to terms and conditions
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] International Olympic Committee tells Flickr
user to change license
To: English Wikipedia wikie...@lists.wikimedia.org
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:42 PM,
Does the contract (private use only for photos) implicitly agreed to by
Giles when he bought a ticket to the Olympics invalidate the CC-BY-SA
license -- In my recollection, the answer is no. It is similar to someone
taking a picture where it says NO PHOTOGRAPHY. They might be breaking
someones
