RE: [Logging] Thread safety guaruntee of Log classes?

Jerome, If you take a look at http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/api/org/apache/commons/logging/package-summary.html , it states common-logging, out-of-box, supports the following impls: - log4j - logkit - no-op - simpleLog (system.out) All of them should be thread-safe. That implies lo

Re: [Jelly] Towards Functional programming in Jelly scripts

I'll withhold judgement on the doTag returns Object idea for now, except to say I've also run into situations where it something like that would be useful (and it may not be that disruptive if most folks extend TagSupport and we did something like: Object doTagWithReturn(XMLOutput out) { doTag(out)

Re: [betwixt] info on .betwixt files, "add" methods, and CyclicReferenceExceptions

On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 10:33 PM, Darren Scott wrote: i have been down this road before. i did start playing around with stacks but betwixt is hard to change without breaking things. I'm glad someone else has noticed it's easy to break it! i think all the committers agree that the

RE: [betwixt] info on .betwixt files, "add" methods, and CyclicReferenceExceptions

> > I've almost got this working (I'm not getting > > CyclicReferenceExceptions any more but I seem to have > broken something > > else as my XML doesn't pay any attention to the .betwixt files!) As > > soon as I've got a working solution I'll post again. > > i have been down this road before.

Re: [betwixt] info on .betwixt files, "add" methods, and CyclicReferenceExceptions

On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 10:07 PM, Darren Scott wrote: The cyclic checking isn't that advanced yet. The scenario that A refers to another A is covered however. Since the cyclic stuff also has some relation when you use id's (and I am not into id's that much), I probably have to have so

[Jelly] Towards Functional programming in Jelly scripts

Hey Jellyfolk, I'm trying to write some Jelly tags specific to a custom component framework. In doing so, I realized that it would be extremely helpful to be able to write functional tags. In effect, I'd like Jelly to be able to support a functional programming paradigm in addition to its curren

RE: [betwixt] info on .betwixt files, "add" methods, and CyclicReferenceExceptions

> > The cyclic checking isn't that advanced yet. The scenario that A > > refers to another A is covered however. Since the cyclic stuff also > > has some relation when you use id's (and I am not into id's that > > much), I probably have to have some help with the id > handling. Time to > > rea

RE: Is this a validator DTD bug?

Typing too fast. Corrections inline below. > -Original Message- > From: Van Riper, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:19 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Is this a validator DTD bug? > > > I have a working Struts 1.1-b2 based webapp that uses the

Is this a validator DTD bug?

I have a working Struts 1.1-b2 based webapp that uses the validation framework. My validation.xml file doesn't validate successfully against this DTD requirement: because when I use both the minlength and maxlength validations on a single field, I end up with more than one element inside the

Re: [Logging] Thread safety guaruntee of Log classes?

added (as a FAQ) to the userguide. thanks. - robert On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 02:35 AM, John Yu wrote: Perhaps this should be added to the doco? "Thread Safely - Common Logging doesn't impose any requirement on thread safety on the underlying implementation and thus its API contrac

dbcp - dataSource.getConnection only fails from within tomcat

could someone guess as to why I can connect to our DB (MySQL) from a standalone application (single, java file using a Main()) successfully using the below code, but when I try to do it from within Tomcat, it fails w/ a nullpointer? thanks - GenericObjectPool connectionPool = new GenericObjectPo

Pool - thread Safe?

Is "The Pool Component" of the commons project completely thread safe and published as such? Thanks, Mohammad A. Quraishi E-Commerce Practice- S322 CIGNA Systems *(860) 226-6988 or 6-6988 * (860) 226-6830 or 6-6830 * > a

Re: [jelly] xml pipeline

I think there is something such in the xml tag-library (you then define a variable). I have started a small one that does the same but with a JDOM document/element. Paul On Jeudi, déce 12, 2002, at 12:54 Europe/Brussels, Wannheden, Knut wrote: But what I was trying to ask is whether a Tag cou

RE: [jelly] xml pipeline

I think that's what DOM's DocumentFragment is for... --DD -Original Message- From: Wannheden, Knut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 5:54 AM To: 'Jakarta Commons Users List' Subject: RE: [jelly] xml pipeline I guess the returned document would either have to be

RE: problem wth CLI

Yes I use the 1.0 version and I don't get yet the CVS source... I will update the sources of CLI, so. Thank you Christophe Marcourt Mondeca Ingénieur R&D 3, Cité Nollez. 75018 Paris Phone : +33 1 44 92 35 03 Mobile : +33 6 14 48 65 66 Fax : +33 1 44 92 02 59 http://www.mondeca.com/fr ICQ : #11981

Re: problem wth CLI

Hi Christophe, Are you using the 1.0 version? A fix for this bug was committed a few weeks ago to CVS. I'll test this when I get a chance. -John K On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 13:59, Christophe Marcourt wrote: > This is weird. I create two options (noChecking and noCreation) with a long > option and

problem wth CLI

This is weird. I create two options (noChecking and noCreation) with a long option and no short options. When I use the "-h" option to display the usage message, I only see the "--no-creation" option. Where is my "--no-checking" option ??? (;-)) I know how to fix this bug. I just have to create th

RE: [Logging] Thread safety guaruntee of Log classes?

Yes, I agree. I certainly get that point. A Log implementation that didn't allow seperate Log instances in seperate threads would truly be pathetic. However since the Commons Logging API makes no thread-safety restrictions such an implementation would still be valid. I was wrong to imply that on

RE: [jelly] xml pipeline

James, > From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > From: "Wannheden, Knut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I just read the new article about the Jelly XML pipeline at > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/jelly/pipeline.html. > > > > > > > > > > > > the would retrieve its body as a

Re: [jelly] xml pipeline

From: "Wannheden, Knut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I just read the new article about the Jelly XML pipeline at > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/jelly/pipeline.html. > > It is stated that a Jelly Tag can choose how to invoke its body. So it > could (amongst other things) evaluate its body bas

[jelly] xml pipeline

I just read the new article about the Jelly XML pipeline at http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/jelly/pipeline.html. It is stated that a Jelly Tag can choose how to invoke its body. So it could (amongst other things) evaluate its body based on some condition or parse its body into some stru