On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> It looks like there were only 69 votes cast. How many committers
> do we have in all? My intuition had been that it was >> 69, but I
> could be wrong.
The nifty page Jim Jagielski put together at
http://apache.org/~jim/committers.html (and thanks
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 11:18, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
> On a related note, can someone report how many subscribers are currently
> on the community list?
134
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
'Most men would rather die than think. Many do.'
Bertrand Russell
I would not expect for most votes to get more than a 25-50% turnout
provided the vote is going the direction the person would like. Ken
gave a subscription figure that was much higher, so I suspect that this
was the result of the silent majority feeling sufficiently represented.
Sanjiva Weeraw
Or that they thought the whole thing was so ridiculous that they couldn't be
bothered replying...
david
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: comments on the votes
> I would not expect for most votes t
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> > Ah, one personal comment, we really need a better voting system :)
> > doing it by hand is boring and very time consuming :/
> >
> +1
The system in ~voter (see foundation cvs) can easily be augmented. My wish
list after
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> I would not expect for most votes to get more than a 25-50% turnout
> provided the vote is going the direction the person would like. Ken
Exactly; I usually watch votes when they are conducted in public; and am
more inclined to vote when they go th
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>
>
> Hmmm. I looked at the datestamp of the original vote message and it
> looked like I was under the 78 hour window for voting. But you are
> correct, it doesn't matter since I am just affirming the result.
>
>
I thought it was 72 hrs ? ;-)
Yeah, right, my mistake. 3 da
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
Hi Stefano,
It looks like there were only 69 votes cast.
Only? This is, in fact, the biggest vote round that ever took place in
the ASF or in any group/project/sub-project/commitee.
How many committers do we have in all? My intuition had been that it
was >> 69, but I c
