One thing the article doesn't mention is that
Britannica has three Apache committers and some
contributors too. Committed to open source since 1768
(or thereabouts). Top that! ;)
- Morgan
--- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://java.sun.com/features/2003/02/britannica.html
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Is this clarification sufficient? If not, what more do we require?
No. What the FSF needs to say is that inclusion of the external
interface names (methods, filenames, imports, etc.) defined by
an LGPL jar file, so that a non-LGPL jar can make calls to the
LGPL jar's imple
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Conor MacNeill wrote:
> Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> >
> > +1. I see nothing wrong with the plan. Hopefully Ant can be made smart
> > enough to pull the jars down from mirrors, too.
> >
>
> Patches always welcome, Brian :-)
The mirror CGI script should be able to handle this
Is this clarification sufficient? If not, what more do we require?
No. What the FSF needs to say is that inclusion of the external
interface names (methods, filenames, imports, etc.) defined by
an LGPL jar file, so that a non-LGPL jar can make calls to the
LGPL jar's implementation, does not caus
Is this clarification sufficient? If not, what more do we require?
If there is a list of unowned todos to be resolved, I'll follow up on them.
Original Message
Subject: Prof Eben Moglen on L/GPL and jars
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:59:02 -0800 (PST)
From: J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROT
http://java.sun.com/features/2003/02/britannica.html
--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate [William of Ockham]
--
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
+1. I see nothing wrong with the plan. Hopefully Ant can be made smart
enough to pull the jars down from mirrors, too.
Patches always welcome, Brian :-)
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
