OpenOffice, too.
Batten down the hatches!
Brian
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
An interest article about the posible attack using patents. An interesting
quote:
They [MS] are specifically upset about Samba, Apache and Sendmail.
Here is the link:
I've submit:
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-95
Let's see what transpires.
regards
Adam
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:20 PM -0400 Brian McCallister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that if 3 ASF'ers want to discuss a topic via email, and think
a mailing list would help, there should be a mechanism to simply have it
created, bang. Just my 2 cents =)
Mailing lists without PMC
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: community@apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)
--On Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:20 PM -0400 Brian McCallister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that if 3 ASF'ers want to
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:20 PM -0400 Brian McCallister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that if 3 ASF'ers want to discuss a topic via email, and think
a mailing list would help, there should be a mechanism to simply have it
created, bang. Just my 2 cents =)
At 03:22 PM 7/21/2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
While your are right about the licenses cocktail. I think the comment is
OT. The main point to post the article to the list, was let the rest of us
know we are on target. That is all. Perhaps 2 years from now we will know
what is prepared for us. If
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:54 PM -0600 Adam R. B. Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I might've missed a better place to post, I don't think so. I thought
about it for a while, and this was the best I came up with. So if you know
of one, then maybe I'm simply clueless, not lazy. Otherwise,
Do you have the same feelings for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to me that members@ is akin to a community-dev list, while
community@ is akin to a community-users list. Any reason to keep members@
should exist for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree that MS Patent stuff is boring and unnecessary on a
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 4:10 PM -0600 Adam R. B. Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you keep assuming it is for chit chat? If it were [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and it was clear (community imposed/whatever) to be about Java @ ASF,
wouldn't that make sense? Aren't there issues (i.e. supporting
At 05:33 PM 7/21/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 4:10 PM -0600 Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you keep assuming it is for chit chat? If it were [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and it was clear (community imposed/whatever) to be about Java @ ASF,
wouldn't that make
I guess it's that I don't follow the argument that topics not specifically
tied to the ASF should be given a home within the ASF. -- justin
Tie them to ASF. I don't want comp.lang.python, I want 'python as it relates
to ASF'.
regards
Adam
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 5:40 PM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think one thing folks are asking for is an
[EMAIL PROTECTED], one where idle questions and chitchat
about cool solutions and code for our servers and sites would be shared.
I wouldn't see an issue with
12 matches
Mail list logo
