On 31.07.2005 23:07:49 robert burrell donkin wrote:
> IIRC when the legal-discuss mailing list was first created, the idea of
> a legal FAQ for committers was floated preferably written by someone
> with legal training. AFAIK this hasn't happened yet.
Sadly, yes.
> i agree with danny
> (http://m
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > IIRC when the legal-discuss mailing list was first created, the idea of
> > a legal FAQ for committers was floated preferably written by someone
> > with legal training. AFAIK this hasn't happened yet.
>
> > .
> > this is something the
Just fyi, the link from http://www.apache.org/dev/ doesn't work as it spells
licence the american way whereas the document linked from
http://www.apache.org/foundation/preFAQ.html names the file the english way.
The licence FAQ is available at:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/licence-FAQ.html
Rob Oxspring wrote:
> Just fyi, the link from http://www.apache.org/dev/ doesn't work as it
> spells licence the american way whereas the document linked from
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/preFAQ.html names the file the english way.
That is what i meant below. It is already fixed, but
are s
Seems that last sentance never reached the brain :)
Sorry for the noise,
Rob
David Crossley wrote:
Rob Oxspring wrote:
Just fyi, the link from http://www.apache.org/dev/ doesn't work as it
spells licence the american way whereas the document linked from
http://www.apache.org/foundation/preF
