Yeah I wasn't saying that there was lazy consensus. I said, if you have
2 +1 VOTES, and you need a 3rd, then you don't have to call the VOTE
closed at that point just b/c 72 hours passed. That you can just say that
the VOTE is open *for at least* 72 hours, and then just leave it open if
you don't
Excellent, so it looks to me like either addressing Ferdy's concerns or
getting a +1 from another PMC member is all you need.
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Apr 23, 2012 8:38 PM, "Lewis John Mcgibbney"
wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Ross
Huh? A release is not lazy consensus. You need three +1 votes.
On Apr 23, 2012 11:52 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hey Lewis,
>
> FYI my reply to you in context on the Gora list:
>
> http://s.apache.org/49d
>
> In general, I just let the VOTE stay open fo
The short answer is that you need to grow the number of active PMC members
(not sure why users is on a vote; they don't at all). You need three +1
votes to ensure that the release has been fully-reviewed. One or two PMC
Members cannot make a release in the name of the ASF. It takes a minimum of
thr
On Apr 23, 2012 2:21 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>...
>
> In theory, the fuzzy end-time could be abused on a contentious VOTE by
say,
> coordinating a block of votes and having the RM terminate the VOTE
immediately
> after those votes come in. So perhaps VOTEs which are expected to be
> contenti
On Apr 23, 2012 3:20 PM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 23, 2012 2:21 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
> >...
>
> >
> > In theory, the fuzzy end-time could be abused on a contentious VOTE by
say,
> > coordinating a block of votes and having the RM terminate the VOTE
immediately
> > after those vote
Hi Ross,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> Ferdy is not listed on the graduation resolution [1] so unless he's
> recently been voted in he is a community member, and a valuable one at
> that since he clearly evaluated the release candidate. His concerns
> should be properly
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> In general, I just let the VOTE stay open for *at least* 72 hours. That way
> folks that are busy/lazy/whatever have a chance to still chime in. The truth
> is,
> as the one that called the VOTE, you are the one pushing for a part
Oops thread correction that original one was held up in mod and
never delivered because I wasn't subscribed on user@. Here's
the one from dev@.
http://s.apache.org/mLZ
Cheers,
Chris
On Apr 23, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hey Lewis,
>
> FYI my reply to you in context on
Hi Ross,
Thanks also for your comments. It's given me something to work to.
Best
Lewis
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> You are correct. All releases must carry three +1 votes. It's one of
> the few fixed points in the Apache Way.
>
> I note from the Gora archives that
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your comments.
Best
Lewis
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hey Lewis,
>
> FYI my reply to you in context on the Gora list:
>
> http://s.apache.org/49d
>
> In general, I just let the VOTE stay open for *at l
On 23 April 2012 16:39, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We recently held a VOTE [0] over on user@ and d...@gora.apache.org and only
> two official VOTE's were actually passed. For the record both were weighted
> in favour of a +1.
>
> Based on the nature of the VOTE and its conforma
Hey Lewis,
FYI my reply to you in context on the Gora list:
http://s.apache.org/49d
In general, I just let the VOTE stay open for *at least* 72 hours. That way
folks that are busy/lazy/whatever have a chance to still chime in. The truth is,
as the one that called the VOTE, you are the one pushin
Hi Everyone,
We recently held a VOTE [0] over on user@ and d...@gora.apache.org and only
two official VOTE's were actually passed. For the record both were weighted
in favour of a +1.
Based on the nature of the VOTE and its conformance to the 'minimum quorum
of three +1 votes' rule I am pretty mu
14 matches
Mail list logo
