y perspective.
Cheers,
Chris
On Apr 23, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Huh? A release is not lazy consensus. You need three +1 votes.
>
> On Apr 23, 2012 11:52 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> wrote:
> Hey Lewis,
>
> FYI my reply to you in context on the
Oops thread correction that original one was held up in mod and
never delivered because I wasn't subscribed on user@. Here's
the one from dev@.
http://s.apache.org/mLZ
Cheers,
Chris
On Apr 23, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hey Lewis,
>
> FYI my repl
Hey Lewis,
FYI my reply to you in context on the Gora list:
http://s.apache.org/49d
In general, I just let the VOTE stay open for *at least* 72 hours. That way
folks that are busy/lazy/whatever have a chance to still chime in. The truth is,
as the one that called the VOTE, you are the one pushin
(cc'ing dev@community and setting reply-to: header so that replies
go there)
Hi Mike,
First off, thanks for replying. Comments inline below:
On Dec 29, 2011, at 6:33 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> I am not an official Apache member, but here's my take on it.
>
> The Extras project area is for
Hey Bertrand,
Oh, OK. I've subscribed to d...@community.apache.org and
will be redirecting my email there then.
Cheers,
Chris
On Dec 29, 2011, at 12:28 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> wrote:
>> ...Ross told
Hey Guys,
I was reading [1] and I noticed item 3.1 and 3.2 stating that projects at
Extras shouldn't
use the org.apache namespace (e.g., if Java), and they shouldn't use the apache
project
name in their extras name. I find this kind of odd.
Here's my concrete situation. Over in Apache OODT vil
