Hi,
a quick look at
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?RecentChanges should
tell you why.
During the past weeks there have been at most four or five real
content edits per week. At the same time our Wiki has attracted an
asian spammer that seems to be switching IP addresses so that
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've discussed this on infrastructure before.
I thought so. But since there are still projects using the old
instance I wanted to raise it here as well.
Someone (probably Leo) will need to be ready to do a final
conversion of the
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
and just because ant doesn't have any sessions, doe that mean the
asf-wide conference shouldn't be mentioned on their page?
I know you've just been picking that as an example, but I want to
ensure that there is no wrong
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone's counting a show of hands here I'm a European and +1 to
opposing software patents in Europe and +1 to the ASF supporting the
demo.
Same here.
Stefan
-
To
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may well be too late for any form of decision, but I propose
that for the duration of the 27th August 2003 we change the index
page of the main ASF web site to point at a page that states our
opposition to the proposal being voted
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a way around all this if you write an interface that is
used to be generic, and have the interface implementation stored
elsewhere.
But the interface implementation would have to be LGPLed again, so
you don't really win
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You do win.. You don't have to have the direct implementation in
apache cvs and ask if the eg gpl'ed software would include an
implementation of that in their distro's.
OK, the interface is there, Ant's Task class. I'm just a
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[X] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[ ] -1 no, let's keep it private
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to
fully subscribe to
