Too bad, the community@ list advocated it and should therefore maintain
it. You're welcome to call a vote to invite him (here's my +1)
-aaron
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 06:06 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
He cannot take it up on community@ -- that list is closed as well.
He's not a committer
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
He cannot take it up on community@ -- that list is closed as well.
He's not a committer.
My memory can be very bad, but I believe we said community@ could also
be 'by invitation'. Given Tim's pertinent remarks and apparent genuine
interest in our operations, we could allo
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> He cannot take it up on community@ -- that list is closed as well.
> He's not a committer.
Though. But that is not an @infrastructure problem.
If the community decides to have a different moderation on community@ or
new mailing list with differen
He cannot take it up on community@ -- that list is closed as well.
He's not a committer.
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Folks,
Open & Closedness of the ASF
This is a very useful and valuable discussion - but this is not the right
place. I'd really encourage you folks to pick up the thread again
