This discussion, and a recent comment about the new
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have had me thinking about ASF
infrastructure, etc.
The question was asked "why start discussion about continuations in the
JVM on a codehaus list when most of the people initially involved are
ASF'ers, etc?"
The answer was
> the list was made the moment it was needed. It
> *could* be created the moment it was needed.
It would be nice if we had such a mechanism. At the moment, list creation
is a long list of steps that involves 3 servers, each with different access
rights.
> I suspect that if 3 ASF'ers want to disc
Happily! Let me know what is done now, and I'll see if I can make it
more easily automated.
-Brian
On Jul 18, 2004, at 5:12 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
the list was made the moment it was needed. It
*could* be created the moment it was needed.
It would be nice if we had such a mechanism. At the m
--On Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:20 PM -0400 Brian McCallister
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suspect that if 3 ASF'ers want to discuss a topic via email, and think
a mailing list would help, there should be a mechanism to simply have it
created, bang. Just my 2 cents =)
Mailing lists without PMC overs
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: Inexpensive Lists (was: Re: Python anybody?)
> --On Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:20 PM -0400 Brian McCallister
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I suspec
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 12:54 PM -0600 "Adam R. B. Jack"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) I might've missed a better place to post, I don't think so. I thought
about it for a while, and this was the best I came up with. So if you know
of one, then maybe I'm simply clueless, not lazy. Otherwise
Do you have the same feelings for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to me that members@ is akin to a community-dev list, while
community@ is akin to a community-users list. Any reason to keep members@
should exist for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree that MS Patent stuff is boring and unnecessary on a communi
--On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 6:22 PM -0400 Henri Yandell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have the same feelings for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes and no. Yes, in the sense that I do wish the S/N ratio on members@
were better (it has gotten better as of late). But, it also exists as a
communication
>
> Language-oriented TLPs have repeatedly demonstrated themselves to be poor
> overseers of code. The 'balancing of the ASF' brings back horrors of the
> reorg@ list which was another of those misguided lists... -- justin
>
If a general cross-project XML list is useful, why not one for language
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 6:22 PM -0400 Henri Yandell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > list. Go read groklaw. However, discussions on whether a python community
> > should exist seem to be perfectly designed for the community list (unless
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo
