On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >>when I subscribed to some mailing lists, I got stunned
> >>at seeing the fact that some mailing lists accepted
> >>spam mails.
> >
> >
> > Some lists were setup wrong. AFAIK, none of the lists should accept mail
> > from non
Noel J. Bergman dijo:
>> Is there any reason we don't run something like Spam Assassin
>
> We do have anti-spam filters. The problem is balancing false positives
> against spam. The bias has been against false positives. I've no doubt
> that more can, and will, be done in the future.
This is a
> > Some lists were setup wrong. AFAIK, none of the lists should accept
mail
> > from non-subscribers without moderation.
> Although there are some lists where it might be nice.
repository@ was setup that way. There was no advertisement of its
existence, yet it was receiving spam. I don't thin
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
when I subscribed to some mailing lists, I got stunned
at seeing the fact that some mailing lists accepted
spam mails.
Some lists were setup wrong. AFAIK, none of the lists should accept mail
from non-subscribers without moderation.
Although there are some lists where it mi
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 12:11:16PM +0900, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
> keen eyes to exact infrastructural issues and "not to omit important
> mails coming to infra@ and root@".
I'm sorry, but what emails have been omitted? Please don't ascribe to
malice what can be explained by lack of time. The pe
> when I subscribed to some mailing lists, I got stunned
> at seeing the fact that some mailing lists accepted
> spam mails.
Some lists were setup wrong. AFAIK, none of the lists should accept mail
from non-subscribers without moderation.
> I thought that this was tightly re
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:33:45 +0200
(Subject: Re: Press PR (was Re: The board is not responsible!))
Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't want to be an "enthusiasm blocker" but I have to agree with
> what Justin already said. Tetsuya, do y
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > 1. website (www.apache.org/ "site" module) maintenance
> > and improvements/suggestions of userfriendliness of each $tlp sites.
>
> I believe the website needs to be ultimately controlled by the infrastructure
> committee. We used to have a separ
I don't want to be an "enthusiasm blocker" but I have to agree with
what Justin already said. Tetsuya, do you think that the suggested
split-ups are reducing the amount of bureaucracy we already have in
ASF-land? If so, can you please be so kind and elaborate further on
this?
I'd be fine with
--On Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:44 AM +0900 Tetsuya Kitahata
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
?? ... press@ can't be found at http://www.apache.org/mail/
neither eyebrowse.
Where can i find the archive (log), by the way?
press@ is not a public list. It is the place where PR firms can (and do)
cont
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
(Subject: Press PR (was Re: The board is not responsible!))
Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 'Public Relations Committee' ... Sounds reasonable.
> We've long had the press@ mailing list. We could inflate
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
'Public Relations Committee' ... Sounds reasonable.
We've long had the press@ mailing list. We could inflate this in a
slightly bigger PR like institution. And also house webite content and
wiki content overview there
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
> 'Public Relations Committee' ... Sounds reasonable.
We've long had the press@ mailing list. We could inflate this in a
slightly bigger PR like institution. And also house webite content and
wiki content overview there. But that seems overkill for m
13 matches
Mail list logo
