Noel J. Bergman wrote:
If the fundamental philosophy of the ASF is Community First, how do you feel
that you contributed to that today?
Quite simple: the ASF has the honour to host mr. Van Zyl's project on
its servers. In return, they get flamed with FUD and ownership.
Bah.
--
Steven Noels
Jason van Zyl wrote:
What irks the hell out of me is people like Nicola constantly whining
about being excluded. Excluded from what?
I find this message quite interesting in this context:
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@jakarta.apache.org/msg07046.html
Expecially your signature.
--
Stefano Mazz
Jason,
> > why aren't Ant and Maven two related projects under a single PMC?
> Well, because when Ant formed they had no desire to be grouped with
> Maven
Based upon your attitude today towards Greg, Sam, Nicola (who isn't even
here, but was accused of whining), etc., I can't say that I blame th
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 10:55, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> I wouldn't phrase it quite that way, but as long as the question is on the
> table: why aren't Ant and Maven two related projects under a single PMC?
Well, because when Ant formed they had no desire to be grouped with
Maven which is perfect
Conor,
I could be wrong, but I don't believe that Dion was refering to the
repository; rather he was commenting in response to my aside regarding Ant
and Maven:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 09:48:42PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Noel Bergman writes:
> > I like the idea of a central repository.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the Ant missionit specifically states the Ant build system as
it's scope.
Hi Dion,
Your subject got my attention :-) Is there an Ant PMC issue here? We're
certainly open to working with other projects within Apache and beyond. Is
Ant's scope statement preventing
