Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-11 Thread Daniel Rall
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... > If you use *regular* programming practices you have to do > > import LGPLObject; > > then > > LGPLObject o = new LGPLObject(); > o.doSomething(); > > that will > > 1) ask the classloader to find that object > 2) allocate memory for

Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-07 Thread Santiago Gala
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Santiago Gala wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Morgan Delagrange wrote: OK, Java-specific question. It seems likely that altering or inlining LGPL code pollutes the Apache license. Are you of the opinion that IMPORTING but not altering or distributing LGPL classes pollutes

Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-07 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Santiago Gala wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Morgan Delagrange wrote: OK, Java-specific question. It seems likely that altering or inlining LGPL code pollutes the Apache license. Are you of the opinion that IMPORTING but not altering or distributing LGPL classes pollutes the Apache licecnse? An

Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-07 Thread Santiago Gala
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Morgan Delagrange wrote: OK, Java-specific question. It seems likely that altering or inlining LGPL code pollutes the Apache license. Are you of the opinion that IMPORTING but not altering or distributing LGPL classes pollutes the Apache licecnse? And if so, can that be

Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-07 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Morgan Delagrange wrote: OK, Java-specific question. It seems likely that altering or inlining LGPL code pollutes the Apache license. Are you of the opinion that IMPORTING but not altering or distributing LGPL classes pollutes the Apache licecnse? And if so, can that be stated on the Wiki page?

Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-07 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 6/2/03 5:25, "Daniel Rall" wrote: > Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Dang, I wish that archive was searchable. [wink, wink] > > Pier, the unix permissions on the Lucene index directory for > community@apache.org don't allow writes by the unix user "apache" > which Catalina

Re: [OT] Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-06 Thread Daniel Rall
Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 21:25:47 -0800 Daniel Rall > wrote: > > > > can't change /opt/tomcat/webapps/eyebrowse/index/apche.org/community > > Man, I hope our search engine doesn't index www.apche.org. Heh, me too. > I actually encounte

[OT] Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-06 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 21:25:47 -0800 Daniel Rall wrote: can't change /opt/tomcat/webapps/eyebrowse/index/apche.org/community Man, I hope our search engine doesn't index www.apche.org. I actually encountered this site at ApacheCon while Brian and David were running etherpeg. ;-) --

Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-06 Thread Daniel Rall
Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dang, I wish that archive was searchable. [wink, wink] Pier, the unix permissions on the Lucene index directory for community@apache.org don't allow writes by the unix user "apache" which Catalina is running as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:dlr$ ls -lad /op

Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-06 Thread Daniel Rall
Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > OK, Java-specific question. It seems likely that > > altering or inlining LGPL code pollutes the Apache > > license. Are you of the opinion that IMPORTING but > > not altering or distributing LGPL classes pollutes the > >

RE: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-06 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Ken, can we get this on the Wiki page to protect > feeble-minded folks like me? > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Licensing I had just finished doing that. I hope that I got them right. --- Noel - To unsu

Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-06 Thread Morgan Delagrange
--- Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > OK, Java-specific question. It seems likely that > > altering or inlining LGPL code pollutes the Apache > > license. Are you of the opinion that IMPORTING > but > > not altering or distributing LGPL classes pollutes > t

Re: Hashing it out [was: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers ...]

2003-02-06 Thread Conor MacNeill
Morgan Delagrange wrote: OK, Java-specific question. It seems likely that altering or inlining LGPL code pollutes the Apache license. Are you of the opinion that IMPORTING but not altering or distributing LGPL classes pollutes the Apache licecnse? And if so, can that be stated on the Wiki page?