Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Thursday 18 January 2007 07:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't know what it is about the guy who posted this thread, but I really > think that he's got some sort of talent for getting people talking. I > posted a similar idea only yesterday that received no replies. Could > someone brief m

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Thursday 18 January 2007 00:09, Renaissance Man wrote: > The reason is neither of them have VoIP via WiFi. > > Who do I talk to ask them to include WiFi connectivity with the > OpenMoko? I'll sell my body parts to get hold of such a device. > > Why does no organisation (even Apple) seem to get i

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
On Thursday 18 January 2007 02:05, Renaissance Man wrote: > I've now read the reasons for its exclusion, but having read Sean's > marketing PDF to the carriers one can't help but wonder if OpenMoko > is just yet another victim of the carrier monopoly on mobile > communications, which would beg the

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Attila Csipa
On Thursday 18 January 2007 02:59, Renaissance Man wrote: > > you seem to have worse autonomy > > No, because you'll still have GSM, and WiFi actually ensures the > carriers lose control over you. Bad wording, was referring to power outlet independance. >> worse coverage >No, you'll have better c

Re: Fwd: Why do I want WiFi?

2007-01-17 Thread Rod Whitby
Alexander McLeay wrote: > On 1/18/07, Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... >> I also connect to IRC, can ssh, and surf the web, all over the bluetooth >> connection. >> >> I expect to be able to do the same with the Neo, except that it will be >> a true PAN BT connection rather than the ppp

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Attila Csipa
On Thursday 18 January 2007 02:17, Renaissance Man wrote: > Anything that allows me to go from spending £45 plus a month on > mobile communications to effectively zero, including talking to my > parents who live on the other side of the planet, is revolutionary. Don't forget that carriers have PLE

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread andy
> On Jan 17, 2007, at 7:37 PM, David Schlesinger wrote: >> The NEO's not _cheap_, exactly: there was a recent survey of 1,800 >> recent >> purchasers of cell phones, and 21--not 21 _percent_, mind you, 21, >> period--paid over $400. Not many more paid as much as $350. > > To me what differentiates

Re: Fwd: Why do I want WiFi?

2007-01-17 Thread Alexander McLeay
On 1/18/07, Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... I also connect to IRC, can ssh, and surf the web, all over the bluetooth connection. I expect to be able to do the same with the Neo, except that it will be a true PAN BT connection rather than the ppp over serial BT connection that I use now

Re: Fwd: Why do I want WiFi?

2007-01-17 Thread Rod Whitby
Jean-Philippe Monteiro wrote: >>> Need to set up a server though, it won't just access my Linksys Box :( >> It will access your Linksys NSLU2 running SlugOS with a bluetooth USB >> dongle plugged into it, sitting beside your Linksys Router ... >> >> I do this today with the Treo 650 to get bluetoot

Battery life?

2007-01-17 Thread Mike
Neo's average battery life when idle in one place, waiting for calls? ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: Fwd: Why do I want WiFi?

2007-01-17 Thread Jean-Philippe Monteiro
> > Need to set up a server though, it won't just access my Linksys Box :( > > It will access your Linksys NSLU2 running SlugOS with a bluetooth USB > dongle plugged into it, sitting beside your Linksys Router ... > > I do this today with the Treo 650 to get bluetooth network coverage in > my house

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Ted Lemon
On Jan 17, 2007, at 7:37 PM, David Schlesinger wrote: The NEO's not _cheap_, exactly: there was a recent survey of 1,800 recent purchasers of cell phones, and 21--not 21 _percent_, mind you, 21, period--paid over $400. Not many more paid as much as $350. To me what differentiates the NEO from

Re: Fwd: Why do I want WiFi?

2007-01-17 Thread Rod Whitby
Jean-Philippe Monteiro wrote: > On Thursday 18 January 2007 09:25, you wrote: >> Thankfully most of this can be done over Bluetooth. At least with >> linux computers you'll be able to access it as a network device, and >> you'll be able to run smb or sshfs albeit at reduced speed. Neos >> won't b

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread David Schlesinger
On 1/17/07 6:12 PM, "Renaissance Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 18 Jan 2007, at 2:00 am, David Schlesinger wrote: > >> You can go out and buy a Nokia 800 or a Sony Mylo today for the >> price of a NEO and do VoIP right this instant. If it's changed the >> world, I guess I must not have been

Re: Fwd: Why do I want WiFi?

2007-01-17 Thread Jean-Philippe Monteiro
On Thursday 18 January 2007 09:25, you wrote: > Thankfully most of this can be done over Bluetooth. At least with > linux computers you'll be able to access it as a network device, and > you'll be able to run smb or sshfs albeit at reduced speed. Neos > won't be islands, even when untethered from

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Ted Lemon
On Jan 17, 2007, at 7:00 PM, David Schlesinger wrote: The revolution evidently has a bunch of people who don't see that the value of half (or ninety-five one-hundredths) of a loaf exceeds that of no loaf at all. I wouldn't take this very seriously. Despite the lack of WiFi, which I defin

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Dimitris Kogias
What makes OpenMoko disruptive where the iPhone may not be is not WiFi or VoIP per se. The key ingredient is the control of one's personal public access handle. Where voice is concerned that's your phone number. Even in locales where number portability is available, the list of players among whi

Re: Why do I want WiFi?

2007-01-17 Thread Renaissance Man
On 18 Jan 2007, at 2:14 am, Jean-Philippe Monteiro wrote: Why do I want WiFi? ... NOT to make expensive VoIP calls in airports - if I want to spend money in airports, there are plenty of other ways... Yeah you could make expense GSM calls instead. Naturally you're much better off using Wi

Fwd: Why do I want WiFi?

2007-01-17 Thread Chad
Thankfully most of this can be done over Bluetooth. At least with linux computers you'll be able to access it as a network device, and you'll be able to run smb or sshfs albeit at reduced speed. Neos won't be islands, even when untethered from USB. :) - Chad ___

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Renaissance Man
On 18 Jan 2007, at 2:00 am, David Schlesinger wrote: You can go out and buy a Nokia 800 or a Sony Mylo today for the price of a NEO and do VoIP right this instant. If it's changed the world, I guess I must not have been paying attention. No you don't appear to be reading correctly what I'm

Why do I want WiFi?

2007-01-17 Thread Jean-Philippe Monteiro
Hi Community A lot of stuff around WiFi these days - A feature that does _not_ seems to be even planned as of now! :) Why do I want WiFi? NOT to make expensive VoIP calls in airports - if I want to spend money in airports, there are plenty of other ways... I want WiFI so that the Phone is a r

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Renaissance Man
On 18 Jan 2007, at 1:29 am, Attila Csipa wrote: Could you share with us WHY do you think that is the killer app ? Because I can cut my telecommunications bill practically down to zero. Most of my phone calls are made at work and home, both of which already have WiFi, but then there's also

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread David Schlesinger
On 1/17/07 5:17 PM, "Renaissance Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 18 Jan 2007, at 12:57 am, Richard Franks wrote: > >> I disagree - VoIP via WiFi is an obvious evolution rather than >> revolutionary. > > But you're looking at it from a geek's point of view instead of a > typical end-user's po

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread hank williams
On 1/17/07, Attila Csipa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 18 January 2007 00:09, Renaissance Man wrote: > Why does no organisation (even Apple) seem to get it that the mobile > communications revolution is through VoIP via WiFi. This is the > killer app. Could you share with us WHY do you

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Ted Lemon
On Jan 17, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Richard Franks wrote: I disagree - VoIP via WiFi is an obvious evolution rather than revolutionary. I don't think it's a 'killer app' either - in the terms of the phone manufacturer who is more likely to benefit from getting 6-12months lead and market share in an unex

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Mike
Renaissance Man wrote: On 18 Jan 2007, at 12:57 am, Richard Franks wrote: I disagree - VoIP via WiFi is an obvious evolution rather than revolutionary. But you're looking at it from a geek's point of view instead of a typical end-user's point of view. Anything that allows me to go from sp

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Renaissance Man writes: >On 18 Jan 2007, at 12:57 am, Richard Franks wrote: > >> I disagree - VoIP via WiFi is an obvious evolution rather than >> revolutionary. > >But you're looking at it from a geek's point of view instead of a >typical end-user's point of view. Around here, a typical end-u

Alternative input, like Dasher

2007-01-17 Thread Derek Pressnall
Quoting Ulrik Rasmussen: Do you know how many words/characters per minute it is possible to achieve? I ran some tests a while ago, using the Zaurus version of quikscript, here's what I posted to a zaurus forum at the time (based on my personal results): : 1) Handwriting recognition: barely 5 -

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Attila Csipa
On Thursday 18 January 2007 00:09, Renaissance Man wrote: > Why does no organisation (even Apple) seem to get it that the mobile > communications revolution is through VoIP via WiFi. This is the > killer app. Could you share with us WHY do you think that is the killer app ? (for DATA applications

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Renaissance Man
On 18 Jan 2007, at 12:57 am, Richard Franks wrote: I disagree - VoIP via WiFi is an obvious evolution rather than revolutionary. But you're looking at it from a geek's point of view instead of a typical end-user's point of view. Anything that allows me to go from spending £45 plus a month

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Renaissance Man
Well, call me when it has WiFi. I just don't think this thing's going to get the start it should have got. I've now read the reasons for its exclusion, but having read Sean's marketing PDF to the carriers one can't help but wonder if OpenMoko is just yet another victim of the carrier monopo

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Alexander McLeay
On 1/18/07, Renaissance Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 18 Jan 2007, at 12:42 am, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > Renaissance Man writes: >> Everything I've read says it doesn't have WiFi. > > It doesn't. But assuming it's a success, there will surely be a > successor soon that does. Or how about guara

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Renaissance Man writes: >On 18 Jan 2007, at 12:42 am, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > >> Renaissance Man writes: >>> Everything I've read says it doesn't have WiFi. >> >> It doesn't. But assuming it's a success, there will surely be a >> successor soon that does. > >Or how about guarantee success by giving

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Richard Franks
On 1/17/07, Renaissance Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The reason is neither of them have VoIP via WiFi. Who do I talk to ask them to include WiFi connectivity with the OpenMoko? I'll sell my body parts to get hold of such a device. Why does no organisation (even Apple) seem to get it that the

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Corey
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 17:40, Renaissance Man wrote: > It doesn't have the one thing it needs to be a revolution. > The revolution will break out when FIC releases the second version of the OpenMoko hardware, which I wouldn't be all too surprised if it happens before the end of the year. Un

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Renaissance Man
Er, and no GSM. The Nokia 800 is as worthless as the iPhone and Neo. In fact the answer is the Nokia N80 and Truphone: http://www.truphone.com/ But the reason I wrote is because I think the iPhone and OpenMoko Neo are great products (much more potential than the Nokia N80), except that they

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Renaissance Man
On 18 Jan 2007, at 12:42 am, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: Renaissance Man writes: Everything I've read says it doesn't have WiFi. It doesn't. But assuming it's a success, there will surely be a successor soon that does. Or how about guarantee success by giving it WiFi. This is all it needs to be

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Renaissance Man writes: >> >> It's just a matter of patience. OpenMoko/Neo is the Way[TM]. > >Everything I've read says it doesn't have WiFi. It doesn't. But assuming it's a success, there will surely be a successor soon that does. In the meantime, a bluetooth access point isn't a great solution

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Renaissance Man
On 17 Jan 2007, at 11:29 pm, Alexander Steinert wrote: They got it. Who got it? But VoIPoWLAN as the *only* speech channel is no killer app, IMHO. It's VoIPoWLAN + GSM. Yeah that's what I meant. GSM's a given. As I said, Truphone offers this capability and you have one phone number whic

Re: Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Alexander Steinert
> Who do I talk to ask them to include WiFi connectivity with the > OpenMoko? I'll sell my body parts to get hold of such a device. I'd resell your kidneys :-) > Why does no organisation (even Apple) seem to get it that the mobile > communications revolution is through VoIP via WiFi. This is

Neither iPhone or OpenMoko are revolutionary

2007-01-17 Thread Renaissance Man
The reason is neither of them have VoIP via WiFi. Who do I talk to ask them to include WiFi connectivity with the OpenMoko? I'll sell my body parts to get hold of such a device. Why does no organisation (even Apple) seem to get it that the mobile communications revolution is through VoIP vi

Re: ipaq sleeves as an example for hardware extensions

2007-01-17 Thread Christopher Heiny
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 14:37, kenneth marken scribbled in crayon on the back of a kid's menu: > Christopher Heiny wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 January 2007 13:48, David Schlesinger scribbled in > > crayon on > > > > the back of a kid's menu: > >> On 1/17/07 1:44 PM, "kenneth marken" <[EMAIL PR

Re: ipaq sleeves as an example for hardware extensions

2007-01-17 Thread kenneth marken
Christopher Heiny wrote: On Wednesday 17 January 2007 13:48, David Schlesinger scribbled in crayon on the back of a kid's menu: On 1/17/07 1:44 PM, "kenneth marken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hmm, i seems to be getting a bit of flak about this on osnews when it comes how bulky the phone can be.

Re: ipaq sleeves as an example for hardware extensions

2007-01-17 Thread Christopher Heiny
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 13:48, David Schlesinger scribbled in crayon on the back of a kid's menu: > On 1/17/07 1:44 PM, "kenneth marken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hmm, i seems to be getting a bit of flak about this on osnews when it > > comes how bulky the phone can be. err, do people ex

Re: ipaq sleeves as an example for hardware extensions

2007-01-17 Thread kenneth marken
David Schlesinger wrote: On 1/17/07 1:44 PM, "kenneth marken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hmm, i seems to be getting a bit of flak about this on osnews when it comes how bulky the phone can be. err, do people expect long lasting wifi from something with the bulk of a samsung ultraslim slider? W

Re: ipaq sleeves as an example for hardware extensions

2007-01-17 Thread David Schlesinger
On 1/17/07 1:44 PM, "kenneth marken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hmm, i seems to be getting a bit of flak about this on osnews when it > comes how bulky the phone can be. err, do people expect long lasting > wifi from something with the bulk of a samsung ultraslim slider? We enjoyed the WiFi s

Re: ipaq sleeves as an example for hardware extensions

2007-01-17 Thread kenneth marken
Eric van Horssen wrote: kenneth marken wrote: http://www.mobiletechreview.com/tips/ipaq_sleeves.htm specifically check out the "compaq pc card expansion sleeve plus". its a pc card (pcmcia iirc) addon that would allow the user to add anything, including wifi cards and similar. The sleeve co

Alternative input, like Dasher

2007-01-17 Thread Ulrik Rasmussen
Derek Pressnall wrote: > One of my favorite alternative inputs is a system callec QuickWriting > (I've also seen it called qwikscript, qwikscroll, etc). The concept > is that you have the alphabet aranged in groups along a circle, where > the circle is divided into eight sections. Each section co

Re: ipaq sleeves as an example for hardware extensions

2007-01-17 Thread Eric van Horssen
kenneth marken wrote: http://www.mobiletechreview.com/tips/ipaq_sleeves.htm specifically check out the "compaq pc card expansion sleeve plus". its a pc card (pcmcia iirc) addon that would allow the user to add anything, including wifi cards and similar. The sleeve could be attached to the US

Re: Fwd: OpenMoko in my area?

2007-01-17 Thread Eric van Horssen
Marcel de Jong wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Bohme wrote: Mike wrote: Marcel de Jong wrote: ps. I really don't like the fact that 'reply' doesn't work on this mailinglist. I have to add the mailaddress myself. (this is the only mailinglist that I know, that does th

Re: X11 and/or Framebuffer

2007-01-17 Thread Mikko Rauhala
ke, 2007-01-17 kello 17:48 +0100, Harald Welte kirjoitti: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xdpyinfo [...] > XVideo This peaked my curiosity; does Neo's display hardware support scaling and/or colorspace conversion independent of the main CPU? Would help with video applications... -- Mikko Rauhala <

Re: X11 and/or Framebuffer

2007-01-17 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Harald Welte writes: > >Thanks, it is already in our bugzilla (who will become public >eventually, wait for the announcement on friday on that) Announcement Friday? Waiting with bated breath... ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmo

Re: X11 and/or Framebuffer

2007-01-17 Thread Harald Welte
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:00:58PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Harald Welte schreef: > > > dimensions:480x640 pixels (163x217 millimeters) > > resolution:75x75 dots per inch > > Your /etc/X11/Xserver is broken, add '-dpi 280' to your

Re: SIM-card cloning

2007-01-17 Thread David Schlesinger
On 1/17/07 8:53 AM, "Robert Michel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PS: But is this cloning legal? It's certainly a crime to clone someone's SIM in an effort to defraud them. I'll bet that, under any circumstances, it's a violation of your carrier's terms of service. ___

Re: X11 and/or Framebuffer

2007-01-17 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harald Welte schreef: > dimensions:480x640 pixels (163x217 millimeters) > resolution:75x75 dots per inch Your /etc/X11/Xserver is broken, add '-dpi 280' to your $ARGS regards, Koen -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Da

Re: I'd like to see a Neo1973 running without battery, but USB powered :) Re: Kingmax announces microSDHC 4G card

2007-01-17 Thread Harald Welte
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 12:20:05PM +0100, Robert Michel wrote: > Salve Ole, *! > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Ole Tange wrote: > > If the microSD is pinwise compatible with SD, would it be possible to: > > > > * take out the battery > > * attach the battery using wires > > If the Neo1973 could run onl

SIM-card cloning

2007-01-17 Thread Robert Michel
Salve Ole! Robert Michel schrieb am Dienstag, den 16. Januar 2007 um 18:16h: > > Why will a cloned SIM not work for you? See: > I didn't know that it is possible to clone a SIM. > I thought they are crypto-chips and have a hidden > key. > > > http://ucables.com/ref/SIM-CLONE > needs also > http:/

Re: X11 and/or Framebuffer

2007-01-17 Thread Harald Welte
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:05:55PM +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > And which X11 extensions? > > My prototype isn't running atm., but I will get back to you with the output > of xdpyinfo tomorrow. see attachment -- - Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://openmok

Re: Real Neo1973 photo / Neo delayed...!?

2007-01-17 Thread Harald Welte
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:36:48AM +0100, Imre Kaloz wrote: > could you tell us if the microsd slot is SDIO capable? I'm pretty sure > some vendors could do a microsd-wifi based on the new Atheros 6000 series > - and those have fully open drivers as well ;) the S3C2410 SD card controller is

Re: Alternative input, like Dasher

2007-01-17 Thread Paul Bohme
Derek Pressnall wrote: One of my favorite alternative inputs is a system callec QuickWriting (I've also seen it called qwikscript, qwikscroll, etc). The concept is that you have the alphabet aranged in groups along a circle, where the circle is divided into eight sections. Each section contains

Re: keyboard / keypad idea

2007-01-17 Thread Eric van Horssen
Justyn Butler wrote: Why not modify a normal screen protector to have raised bumps in a keyboard layout, but leave the whole thing transparent. A screen protector is just a piece of plastic film with adhesive round the edges. The protector will live on the screen all the time and you could pro

Re: Alternative input, like Dasher

2007-01-17 Thread Derek Pressnall
One of my favorite alternative inputs is a system callec QuickWriting (I've also seen it called qwikscript, qwikscroll, etc). The concept is that you have the alphabet aranged in groups along a circle, where the circle is divided into eight sections. Each section contains 5 characters. To selec

Re: X11 and/or Framebuffer

2007-01-17 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Just a question: will the OpenMoko come with FB and/or X11? The default environment uses X11 -- in fact, Xfbdev, which is an X11 server using the Linux framebuffer. > And which X11 extensions? My prototype isn't running atm., but I will get back to you with the

Re:X11 and/or Framebuffer

2007-01-17 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller writes: >Just a question: will the OpenMoko come with FB and/or X11? According to the Amsterdam presentation, X11. http://www.openmoko.com/files/OpenMoko_Amsterdam.pdf Also, according to something someplace where I can't find it at the moment, GTK+. >And which X11 extens

Re: More info on standard applications

2007-01-17 Thread Joseph J. McCarthy
> > mailing/calendar/todo etc applications, anybody have an idea? > > As a guess it will include the GPE apps for this? *wonder* That would be nice, but I have not seen any mysterious contributors lately to the codebase so I doubt it (unless they want to keep their patches, etc. outside mainstrea

Re: Gaming oportunities

2007-01-17 Thread Richard Franks
On 1/17/07, Stuart Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As a games programming student I see alot of potential for games on the touchscreen phones. Although there are no buttons (or none we can really use for the games) Assuming that the placement of the two buttons is suitable.. unless they both h

RE: Gaming oportunities

2007-01-17 Thread Stuart Gray
As a games programming student I see alot of potential for games on the touchscreen phones. Although there are no buttons (or none we can really use for the games) I still see a number of possibilities. http://www.gamedesign.jp/flash/dice/dice.html that is a simple game I want to see on the open

Re: More info on standard applications

2007-01-17 Thread Andreas Kostyrka
* Eildert Groeneveld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070116 19:59]: > Hello folks > > the thaught to run vi on the command line on a cell phone really has > something... > > but on a somewhat more serious note: what is known about the > mailing/calendar/todo etc applications, anybody have an idea? As a g

Re: WiFi through Bluetooth (Was: Non-gprs Internet access options without wifi)

2007-01-17 Thread Andreas Kostyrka
>Who knows, perhaps the software will bridge wifi->bluetooth as a feature >and selling point by the time it's released. It makes sense to me, they've >got everything they need right there. As long as their phone supports the >PAN bluetooth profile (or maybe even just DUN), plenty of

ipaq sleeves as an example for hardware extensions

2007-01-17 Thread kenneth marken
http://www.mobiletechreview.com/tips/ipaq_sleeves.htm specifically check out the "compaq pc card expansion sleeve plus". its a pc card (pcmcia iirc) addon that would allow the user to add anything, including wifi cards and similar. sure it will add bulk to the phone, but the flexibility that

Re: Question about kernel level hacking

2007-01-17 Thread Alessandro Iurlano
On 1/15/07, Alessandro Iurlano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/13/07, Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/12/07 9:26 AM, "Heilpern, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I can only speculate, but I would expect a JTAG port to be made > available -- > > probably on the phone

Re: X11 and/or Framebuffer

2007-01-17 Thread Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
but does it come with X11 and FB and with which X11 extensions? The second document is great but it just mentiones libX11 and X11 Applications in the graphics on page 15 as sort of an option. Nikolaus Am 17.01.2007 um 09:40 schrieb Koen Kooi: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

Stylus

2007-01-17 Thread Sven Neuhaus
Hello, some questions about using a stylus with the Neo1973: Is the Neo1973 designed to be used with a stylus? Is there a place inside the phone to store a stylus? Will there be handwriting recognition software available at launch or shortly thereafter? -Sven

Re: phone bot idea

2007-01-17 Thread Andreas Kostyrka
Yes, but this could probably be best solved by adding some scripting language to the phone, because this style of thing *) is simple to do with say Python (I've got the reverse setup where a jabber client on my Nokia interacts with a jabber bot on the internet) *) is very specific to the user's n

Re: X11 and/or Framebuffer

2007-01-17 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller schreef: > Just a question: will the OpenMoko come with FB and/or X11? As a general note to the mailinglist: All official info is available from http://www.openmoko.com/press/index.html As a note to people wondering about the

Re: "2.5G NOT EDGE"

2007-01-17 Thread Andreas Kostyrka
* Craig St Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070117 06:39]: > Hello, > Just wondering, does that mean its EVDO? Or something else? I have Cingular, > which supports I believe only EDGE (2G and 2.5G?) and 3G. Could someone > please expand on the "2.5G NOT Nope, it means GPRS. btw, the Neo is a GSM quad-ba

X11 and/or Framebuffer

2007-01-17 Thread Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
Just a question: will the OpenMoko come with FB and/or X11? And which X11 extensions? Nikolaus Schaller ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: Register article

2007-01-17 Thread Ben F-W
Jason Elwell wrote: On 1/16/07, Ben Fleming-Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Sean Moss-Pultz, the project's architect, expects the first samples of OpenMoko hardware to ship in March 2007." www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/01/15/open_phone/ Surely just a mis-printright? Well,