On Thu, 3 May 2007, Hans L wrote:
> I know at least one simple fix for shaving off a few grams. IMO there
> is really no reason to have *two* speakers in the phone. Take one out.
> AFAIK Stereo sound works best when the sources are far apart, but in
> this case they are essentially coming fr
Hmm... I cannot find any good reason to have 2 speakers eighter. Maybe the
reason is that they want the sound to be better distributed in all
direction? - Anyway, you can always remove one or two speakers when you get
the phone. It is not very complicated.
_
Hans L writes:
>I know at least one simple fix for shaving off a few grams. IMO there
>is really no reason to have *two* speakers in the phone. Take one
>out. AFAIK Stereo sound works best when the sources are far apart,
>but in this case they are essentially coming from the same point in
>space
I know at least one simple fix for shaving off a few grams. IMO there
is really no reason to have *two* speakers in the phone. Take one
out. AFAIK Stereo sound works best when the sources are far apart,
but in this case they are essentially coming from the same point in
space.
IFAIK, correct me if I am mistaking, the heavy parts is the battery and the
plastic (and maybe the touch screen).
The phone is intended as a developer phone, and it has a lot of extra stuff
like gps, jTag, and more...
For me it is important that the phone is solid (don't break when I drop it)
and
Ian Stirling writes:
>Sander van Grieken wrote:
>>> Ian Stirling wrote:
>>> That's not solely robustness though, air resistance helps lots too.
>>
>> Hmm do you propose a furry casing?
>
>I have in the past proposed little legs and arms like seen in the adverts.
>Fur would just be fun.
>However.
>
Sander van Grieken wrote:
Ian Stirling wrote:
That's not solely robustness though, air resistance helps lots too.
Hmm do you propose a furry casing?
I have in the past proposed little legs and arms like seen in the adverts.
Fur would just be fun.
However.
To stop it getting tangled up, it'd h
I think is better to compare with this nokia new model, price is also
interesting( in Italy)
9300i 172g 132x51x21 mm 126cc 475€ wifi
E65 115g 105x49x15.5mm74cc 360€ wifi
N95 120g 99x53x21mm 728€ GPS+wifi
also interesting this model without phone:
N800 206g 75x14
> Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> That's not solely robustness though, air resistance helps lots too.
Hmm do you propose a furry casing?
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/com
Hello
I have been using for several years now a Nokia 7710. It is a little bigger
than the Neo.
* Weight:189 g
* Dimensions:128 x 69.5 x 19 mm
But the greatest feature about this mobile phone is the screen size and
resolution.
* 640 x 320 pixel
Reading my email and attached documents
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 03.05.2007 um 13:32 schrieb Ian Stirling:
wim delvaux wrote:
FWIW,
most of these 'light' phones do seem so 'fragile'. It looks like any
drop from pocket or table might smash them to bits. Less weight
generally means more flimsy devices.
No. It is easy
Am 03.05.2007 um 13:32 schrieb Ian Stirling:
wim delvaux wrote:
FWIW,
most of these 'light' phones do seem so 'fragile'. It looks like
any drop from pocket or table might smash them to bits. Less
weight generally means more flimsy devices.
No. It is easy to make a fragile looking devic
wim delvaux wrote:
FWIW,
most of these 'light' phones do seem so 'fragile'. It looks like any drop
from pocket or table might smash them to bits. Less weight generally means
more flimsy devices.
I have had the NEO in my hands and although the numbers may make if sound like
it is chunky it
Plenty of good points well made and also some good points not so well made
;)
The fact that FIC are keen to build a whole slew of devices about openmoko
is great news and I hope that we will see different form factor phones as
well as other devices.
That said I am almost more excited about getti
FWIW,
most of these 'light' phones do seem so 'fragile'. It looks like any drop
from pocket or table might smash them to bits. Less weight generally means
more flimsy devices.
I have had the NEO in my hands and although the numbers may make if sound like
it is chunky it is not AND when held
Andreas Kostyrka wrote:
> Sven Neuhaus wrote:
>> here's the size and weight of a few touchscreen mobile phones:
>
>> Neo1973 iPhone M600i LG Prada
>> length (mm) 120.7115 107 98.8
>> width 62 61 57 54
>> height18.5 11.6 15
16 matches
Mail list logo