El día Thursday, April 21, 2011 a las 10:10:37AM +, Niels Heyvaert escribió:
>
> Hi all,
>
> To those of you who didn't see summary flying by on Linuxtoday.com, there is
> recent article published about the Openmoko:
>
> http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/mowi/article.php/3931296/What-Happ
Greetings,
> I'm still using my FR as my daily and only cellphone (it still runs
> Om2008.9) and I'm happy with it, [...].
I am glad to see someone saying that :-)
I am also using my freerunner (with QtMoko) as my only phone and I am
also very happy with it. Of course, I also find a few "gli
Great!
Thanks!
--
##
giacomo 'giotti' mariani
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-key 0x99bfa859
O< ASCII ribbon campaign: stop HTML mail
www.asciiribbon.org
##
__
On Friday 22 April 2011 09:56:07 Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I'm still using my FR as my daily and only cellphone (it still runs
> Om2008.9) and I'm happy with it, even if the battery is poor and lasts
> only 6-8 hours. But I don't care because I nearly always have my laptop
> or some external batteri
I have been measuring battery life with 2.6.37 kernel under QtMoko and after 5
days without recharging the battery was low but it still worked. So it looks
like freerunner is maybe one of the best smarphones as for battery life,
Regards
Radek
WOW
When will it be available for us?
Giacomo
Radek,
On 2011-04-22 18:56, Radek Polak wrote:
On Friday 22 April 2011 09:56:07 Matthias Apitz wrote:
I'm still using my FR as my daily and only cellphone (it still runs
Om2008.9) and I'm happy with it, even if the battery is poor and lasts
only 6-8 hours. But I don't care because I nearly al
Hi
I have been measuring battery life with 2.6.37 kernel under QtMoko and after 5
days without recharging the battery was low but it still worked. So it looks
like freerunner is maybe one of the best smarphones as for battery life,
Just for the record, I find that remarkable. I'm running
QtMok
On Friday 22 April 2011 11:04:29 giacomo 'giotti' mariani wrote:
> > I have been measuring battery life with 2.6.37 kernel under QtMoko and
> > after 5 days without recharging the battery was low but it still worked.
> > So it looks like freerunner is maybe one of the best smarphones as for
> > ba
Radek,
On 2011-04-23 00:40, Radek Polak wrote:
On Friday 22 April 2011 11:04:29 giacomo 'giotti' mariani wrote:
I have been measuring battery life with 2.6.37 kernel under QtMoko and
after 5 days without recharging the battery was low but it still worked.
So it looks like freerunner is maybe
great guys, please put your documentation of trying this onto the wiki.
Jon
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Jan Tuennermann
wrote:
> I think ROS would not be a benefit for the OpenMoko as a phone, it makes it
> very attractive for application in robotics or other controlling
> applications.
>
>
Since:
linux-image-2.6.37-qtmoko-gta02_v34-1_armel.deb
is v34, should:
uImage.bin-2.6.37-qtmoko
be installed along with:
qi-v34.udfu
and:
qtmoko-debian-v34.ubi
? (I currently have the v35 stuff installed).
You can use it also with v35.
Regards
Radek
_
radek
On 2011-04-23 15:44, radek polak wrote:
Since:
linux-image-2.6.37-qtmoko-gta02_v34-1_armel.deb
is v34, should:
uImage.bin-2.6.37-qtmoko
be installed along with:
qi-v34.udfu
and:
qtmoko-debian-v34.ubi
? (I currently have the v35 stuff installed).
You can use it also with v35.
12 matches
Mail list logo