On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 21:32 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 03.10.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Bob Ham:
I would note that the GTA04 is not a Free Hardware project.
Yes that is correct. It is not Free Hardware in the strict FSF definition
I don't think FSF has a definition of Free
On Fri 04 October 2013 19:48:19 Bob Ham wrote:
You've previously said that the reason you refuse to release the
hardware source files, making the device more open, is because you
expect money in return. Are you now saying restricting access to the
hardware source files is somehow a design
Am 04.10.2013 um 19:48 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 21:32 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 03.10.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Bob Ham:
I would note that the GTA04 is not a Free Hardware project.
Yes that is correct. It is not Free Hardware in the strict FSF definition
I
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 20:16 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 04.10.2013 um 19:48 schrieb Bob Ham:
I don't think FSF has a definition of Free Hardware. Possibly we're
ascribing different meanings to the phrase.
Yes they have one and even do a certification (which would not be
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
I already told you that the hardware source files are open and public.
I agree with Bob Ham on this. The source files are not public and even
the PDFs are not open, they are licensed under a non-commercial
license (CC-BY-NC-SA).
Am 04.10.2013 um 21:26 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 20:16 +0200, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 04.10.2013 um 19:48 schrieb Bob Ham:
I don't think FSF has a definition of Free Hardware. Possibly we're
ascribing different meanings to the phrase.
Yes they have one and even
Am 05.10.2013 um 05:09 schrieb Paul Wise:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
I already told you that the hardware source files are open and public.
I agree with Bob Ham on this. The source files are not public and even
the PDFs are not open, they are licensed
7 matches
Mail list logo
