Re: [ASU 2008.9] Is it required to reflash, or opkg update & upgrade is enough?

2008-09-20 Thread Yogiz
> > Why won't we just invent cool codenames for the distros? > > Maybe because they are not really distributions, but just point > releases / milestones of the same branch ? > > Distribution = ASU > ASU release point zéro = Om 2008.8 > ASU release point one = Om 2008.9 > ASU 2008.8 + updates = A

Re: [ASU 2008.9] Is it required to reflash, or opkg update & upgrade is enough?

2008-09-20 Thread Minh Ha Duong
> Why won't we just invent cool codenames for the distros? Maybe because they are not really distributions, but just point releases / milestones of the same branch ? Distribution = ASU ASU release point zéro = Om 2008.8 ASU release point one = Om 2008.9 ASU 2008.8 + updates = ASU 2008.8 + updat

Re: [ASU 2008.9] Is it required to reflash, or opkg update & upgrade is enough?

2008-09-20 Thread Yogiz
Why won't we just invent cool codenames for the distros? Ever wondered why Ubuntu is so popular? It's because their releases sound awsome : D. What would I prefer: Slackware 12.0 or Ubuntu Kinky Kangaroo. I know which I would pick. We're allowed to have a little fun here. Yogiz __

Re: [ASU 2008.9] Is it required to reflash, or opkg update & upgrade is enough?

2008-09-20 Thread Minh Ha Duong
>> Yes. This is all correct. >> Those with 2008.8-update will already be ahead of 2008.9. It's the name >> that throws people off. We're looking to change to 2008-update or >> 2008-stable. Please stay tuned. >> > Will > > Also stable isn't that good, because people will think >it is stable,

Re: [ASU 2008.9] Is it required to reflash, or opkg update & upgrade is enough?

2008-09-20 Thread Alasal
William Lai wrote: > > Yes. This is all correct. > Those with 2008.8-update will already be ahead of 2008.9. It's the name > that throws people off. We're looking to change to 2008-update or > 2008-stable. Please stay tuned. > > Will > I wouldn't change to something with 2008 in it. Th

Re: [ASU 2008.9] Is it required to reflash, or opkg update & upgrade is enough?

2008-09-19 Thread William Lai
Alasal wrote: > I think (by looking at the bugs that are fixed and aren't fixed) that the > om2008.9 is the same as om2008.8 updated between 16 september and 18 > september. Because on 18 september there were updates for the om2008.8 that > aren't included by default in 2008.9. But the updates are

Re: [ASU 2008.9] Is it required to reflash, or opkg update & upgrade is enough?

2008-09-19 Thread Vasco Névoa
Alasal wrote: > I think (by looking at the bugs that are fixed and aren't fixed) that the > om2008.9 is the same as om2008.8 updated between 16 september and 18 > september. Because on 18 september there were updates for the om2008.8 that > aren't included by default in 2008.9. But the updates are

Re: [ASU 2008.9] Is it required to reflash, or opkg update & upgrade is enough?

2008-09-19 Thread Alasal
I think (by looking at the bugs that are fixed and aren't fixed) that the om2008.9 is the same as om2008.8 updated between 16 september and 18 september. Because on 18 september there were updates for the om2008.8 that aren't included by default in 2008.9. But the updates are also available for th

[ASU 2008.9] Is it required to reflash, or opkg update & upgrade is enough?

2008-09-19 Thread Martin Šenkeřík
The question is in subject. Does anybody know? ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community